Recent Updates
  • I AM BACK ON LETSBEFREE...IT'S BEEN A WHILE...GREETINGS FROM THE PILBARA WESTERN AUSTRALIA :)
    I AM BACK ON LETSBEFREE...IT'S BEEN A WHILE...GREETINGS FROM THE PILBARA WESTERN AUSTRALIA :)
    2
    6 Comments 0 Shares
  • https://mailchi.mp/cedcf829d461/on-the-brink-radio-338-australian-whale-anomaly-seizing-the-synchronicity-mars-at-perigee-record-rain-in-darwin
    https://mailchi.mp/cedcf829d461/on-the-brink-radio-338-australian-whale-anomaly-seizing-the-synchronicity-mars-at-perigee-record-rain-in-darwin
    MARINE MAMMALS OF NEW ZEALAND ARE UNDER ATTACK BIG-TIME BY HYDRO-CARBON EXPLORATION...DOWNLOAD POSTER HERE:

    http://www.doc.govt.nz/.../marin.../marine-mammal-poster.pdf
    1 Comments 0 Shares
  • MARINE MAMMALS OF NEW ZEALAND ARE UNDER ATTACK BIG-TIME BY HYDRO-CARBON EXPLORATION...DOWNLOAD POSTER HERE:

    http://www.doc.govt.nz/.../marin.../marine-mammal-poster.pdf
    MARINE MAMMALS OF NEW ZEALAND ARE UNDER ATTACK BIG-TIME BY HYDRO-CARBON EXPLORATION...DOWNLOAD POSTER HERE: http://www.doc.govt.nz/.../marin.../marine-mammal-poster.pdf
    0 Comments 1 Shares
  • AUSCHWITZ WAS A TIRE FACTORY...AND MORE...and the 'UNVAXXED' ARE NOW WHAT 'JEWS' WERE IN NAZI GERMANY...HAVE WE COME THIS FAR TO REVERT TO THIS?

    Most of the people in Nazi Germany thought they were living the best days of their lives and that all those smoke-stacks billowing were from tire factories...and in the case of some of them, this was in fact the case...tire factories operated by slave labour who were summarily executed by gas, then burned in the ovens. Their nationalistic pride, herd mentality and fear of 'being different' all combined to generate a mass-delusion unsurpassed until...now!!!!!!!! Unquestioning obedience to authority is not only the relinquishment of 'freedom' but the total abnegation of social, psychological and spiritual health and responsibility.

    The 'unvaxxed' non-compliant resistors are now being targeted as 'the enemy' = THE EXACT PROCESS HITLER USED TO CREATE EVIL SCAPE-GOATS WHOSE ELIMINATION WOULD BRING HARMONY TO THE NATION
    AUSCHWITZ WAS A TIRE FACTORY...AND MORE...and the 'UNVAXXED' ARE NOW WHAT 'JEWS' WERE IN NAZI GERMANY...HAVE WE COME THIS FAR TO REVERT TO THIS? Most of the people in Nazi Germany thought they were living the best days of their lives and that all those smoke-stacks billowing were from tire factories...and in the case of some of them, this was in fact the case...tire factories operated by slave labour who were summarily executed by gas, then burned in the ovens. Their nationalistic pride, herd mentality and fear of 'being different' all combined to generate a mass-delusion unsurpassed until...now!!!!!!!! Unquestioning obedience to authority is not only the relinquishment of 'freedom' but the total abnegation of social, psychological and spiritual health and responsibility. The 'unvaxxed' non-compliant resistors are now being targeted as 'the enemy' = THE EXACT PROCESS HITLER USED TO CREATE EVIL SCAPE-GOATS WHOSE ELIMINATION WOULD BRING HARMONY TO THE NATION
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • "And I'll still be here in 2250 because I can afford the most expensive and advanced life-extending nano-technology implants........who needs carbon, I'm a silicon child now!":)
    "And I'll still be here in 2250 because I can afford the most expensive and advanced life-extending nano-technology implants........who needs carbon, I'm a silicon child now!":)
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • NEW ZEALAND'S ARDERN TO HOST EMERGENCY APEC VIRUS SUMMIT

    NOTE: This is TEXT-BOOK NEW WORLD ORDER 'LEADERSHIP' SCRIPT

    https://www.terradaily.com/reports/New_Zealands_Ardern_to_host_emergency_APEC_virus_summit_999.html

    " The White House said it would be Biden's first opportunity to...provide an update to leaders on what the US is doing to serve as AN ARSENAL OF VACCINES for the region."

    "Nobody is safe until everyone is safe," she said.

    "Ardern also wants GREATER POWERS for the World Health Organisation, as well as the establishment of CROSS-BORDER SYSTEMS to rapidly identify and respond to future pandemics."
    NEW ZEALAND'S ARDERN TO HOST EMERGENCY APEC VIRUS SUMMIT NOTE: This is TEXT-BOOK NEW WORLD ORDER 'LEADERSHIP' SCRIPT https://www.terradaily.com/reports/New_Zealands_Ardern_to_host_emergency_APEC_virus_summit_999.html " The White House said it would be Biden's first opportunity to...provide an update to leaders on what the US is doing to serve as AN ARSENAL OF VACCINES for the region." "Nobody is safe until everyone is safe," she said. "Ardern also wants GREATER POWERS for the World Health Organisation, as well as the establishment of CROSS-BORDER SYSTEMS to rapidly identify and respond to future pandemics."
    WWW.TERRADAILY.COM
    New Zealand's Ardern to host emergency APEC virus summit
    Wellington (AFP) July 15, 2021 - New Zealand's Jacinda Ardern will host an emergency meeting of APEC leaders Friday aimed at bolstering vaccine rollouts to contain the fast-spreading coronavirus variants now fuelling the pandemic.
    1
    3 Comments 0 Shares
  • 'PROPAGANDA IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY', Aldous Huxley, 'Brave New World Revisited' (1956)

    NOTE: This is a non-fiction follow-up look at the predictions and observations Huxley conveyed in Brave New World. The chapters on propaganda in both democratic and totalitarian societies are relevent today.

    https://archive.org/stream/Brave_New_World_Revisited/Brave%20New%20World%20Revisited%20-%20Huxley%20%281958%29_djvu.txt

    "Liberalism flourishes in an atmosphere of prosperity and declines as declining prosperity makes it necessary for the government to intervene ever more frequently and drastically in the affairs of its subjects...in the immediate future there is some reason to believe that the punitive methods of 1984 will give place to the reinforcements and manipulations of Brave New World...Propaganda in favor of action that is consonant with enlightened self-interest appeals to reason by means of logical arguments based upon the best available evidence fully and honestly set forth. Propaganda in favor of action dictated by the impulses that are below self-interest offers false, garbled or incomplete evidence, avoids logical argument and seeks to influence its victims by the mere repetition of catchwords, by the furious denunciation of foreign or domestic scapegoats, and by cunningly associating the lowest passions with the highest ideals, so that atrocities come to be perpetrated in the name of God and the most cynical kind of Realpolitik is treated as a matter of religious principle and patriotic duty."

    PROPAGANDA IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY

    "The doctrines of Europe," Jefferson wrote, "were that men in numerous
    associations cannot be restrained within the limits of order and justice, except by forces physical and moral wielded over them by authorities independent of their will. . . . We (the founders of the new American democracy) believe that man was a rational animal, endowed by nature with rights, and with an innate sense of justice, and that he could be
    restrained from wrong, and protected in right, by moderate powers, confided to persons of his own choice and held to their duties by dependence on his own will."

    To post- Freudian ears, this kind of language seems touchingly quaint and ingenuous. Human beings are a good deal less rational and innately just than the optimists of the eighteenth century supposed. On the other hand they are neither so morally blind nor so hopelessly unreasonable as the pessimists of the twentieth would have us believe. In spite of the Id and the Unconscious, in spite of endemic neurosis and the prevalence of low IQ's, most men and women are probably decent enough and sensible enough to be trusted with the direction of their own destinies.

    Democratic institutions are devices for reconciling social order with individual freedom and initiative, and for making the immediate power of a country's rulers subject to the ultimate power of the ruled. The fact that, in Western Europe and America, these devices have worked, all things considered, not too badly is proof enough that the eighteenth-century optimists were not entirely wrong. Given a fair chance, human beings
    can govern themselves, and govern themselves better, though perhaps with less mechanical efficiency, than they can be governed by "authorities independent of their will." Given a fair chance, I repeat; for the fair chance is an indispensable prerequisite.

    No people that passes abruptly from a state of subservience under the rule of a despot to the completely unfamiliar state of political independence can be said to have a fair chance of making democratic institutions work. Again, no people in a precarious economic condition has a fair chance of being able to govern itself democratically. Liberalism
    flourishes in an atmosphere of prosperity and declines as declining prosperity makes it necessary for the government to intervene ever more frequently and drastically in the affairs of its subjects. Over-population and over-organization are two conditions which, as I have already pointed out, deprive a society of a fair chance of making democratic
    institutions work effectively. We see, then, that there are certain historical,economic, demographic and technological conditions which make it very hard for Jefferson's rational animals, endowed by nature with inalienable rights and an innate sense of justice, to exercise their reason, claim their rights and act justly within a democratically organized society.

    We in the West have been supremely fortunate in having been given
    our fair chance of making the great experiment in self-government. Unfortunately it now looks as though, owing to recent changes in our circumstances, this infinitely precious fair chance were being, little by little, taken away from us. And this, of course, is not the whole story. These blind impersonal forces are not the only enemies of individual liberty and democratic institutions. There are also forces of another, less abstract character, forces that can be deliberately used by power-seeking individuals whose aim is to establish partial or complete control over their fellows. Fifty years ago, when I was a boy, it seemed completely self-evident that the bad old days were over, that torture and massacre, slavery, and the persecution of heretics, were things of the past. Among people who wore top hats, traveled in trains, and took a bath every morning such horrors were simply out of the question. After all, we were living in the twentieth century. A few years later these people who took daily baths and went to church in top hats were committing atrocities on a scale undreamed of by the benighted Africans and Asiatics. In the light of
    recent history it would be foolish to suppose that this sort of thing cannot happen again. It can and, no doubt, it will. But in the immediate future there is some reason to believe that the punitive methods of 1984 will give place to the reinforcements and manipulations of Brave New World.

    There are two kinds of propaganda — rational propaganda in favor of action that is consonant with the enlightened self-interest of those who make it and those to whom it is addressed, and non-rational propaganda that is not consonant with anybody's enlightened self-interest, but is dictated by, and appeals to, passion. Where the actions of individuals
    are concerned there are motives more exalted than enlightened self-interest, but where collective action has to be taken in the fields of politics and economics, enlightened self- interest is probably the highest of effective motives. If politicians and their constituents always acted to promote their own or their country's long-range self-interest, this world
    would be an earthly paradise. As it is, they often act against their own interests, merely to gratify their least creditable passions; the world, in consequence, is a place of misery.

    Propaganda in favor of action that is consonant with enlightened self-interest appeals to reason by means of logical arguments based upon the best available evidence fully and honestly set forth. Propaganda in favor of action dictated by the impulses that are below self-interest offers false, garbled or incomplete evidence, avoids logical argument and seeks to influence its victims by the mere repetition of catchwords, by the furious
    denunciation of foreign or domestic scapegoats, and by cunningly associating the lowest passions with the highest ideals, so that atrocities come to be perpetrated in the name of God and the most cynical kind of Realpolitik is treated as a matter of religious principle and patriotic duty.

    In John Dewey's words, "a renewal of faith in common human nature, in its
    potentialities in general, and in its power in particular to respond to reason and truth, is a surer bulwark against totalitarianism than a demonstration of material success or a devout worship of special legal and political forms." The power to respond to reason and truth exists in all of us. But so, unfortunately, does the tendency to respond to unreason and
    falsehood — particularly in those cases where the falsehood evokes some enjoyable emotion, or where the appeal to unreason strikes some answering chord in the primitive, subhuman depths of our being. In certain fields of activity men have learned to respond to reason and truth pretty consistently. The authors of learned articles do not appeal to the
    passions of their fellow scientists and technologists. They set forth what, to the best of their knowledge, is the truth about some particular aspect of reality, they use reason to explain the facts they have observed and they support their point of view with arguments that appeal to reason in other people. All this is fairly easy in the fields of physical science and technology. It is much more difficult in the fields of politics and religion and ethics. Here the relevant facts often elude us. As for the meaning of the facts, that of course depends upon the particular system of ideas, in terms of which you choose to interpret them. And these are not the only difficulties that confront the rational truth- seeker. In public and in private life, it often happens that there is simply no time to collect the relevant facts or to weigh their significance. We are forced to act on insufficient
    evidence and by a light considerably less steady than that of logic. With the best will in the world, we cannot always be completely truthful or consistently rational. All that is in our power is to be as truthful and rational as circumstances permit us to be, and to respond as well as we can to the limited truth and imperfect reasonings offered for our
    consideration by others.

    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free," said Jefferson, "it expects what never was and never will be. . . . The people cannot be safe without information. Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe." Across the Atlantic another passionate believer in reason was thinking about the same time, in almost precisely similar terms. Here is what John Stuart Mill wrote of his father, the utilitarian philosopher, James Mill: "So complete was his reliance upon the influence of reason over the minds of mankind, whenever it is allowed to reach them, that he felt as if all would be gained, if the whole population were able to read, and if all sorts of opinions were allowed to be addressed to them by word or in writing, and if by the suffrage they could nominate a legislature to give effect to the opinions they had adopted." All is safe, all would be gained! Once more we hear the note of eighteenth-century optimism. Jefferson, it is true, was a realist as well as an optimist. He knew by bitter experience that the freedom of the press can be shamefully abused. "Nothing," he declared, "can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper." And yet, he insisted (and we can only agree with
    him), "within the pale of truth, the press is a noble institution, equally the friend of science and civil liberty." Mass communication, in a word, is neither good nor bad; it is simply a force and, like any other force, it can be used either well or ill. Used in one way, the press, the radio and the cinema are indispensable to the survival of democracy. Used in another way, they are among the most powerful weapons in the dictator's armory. In
    the field of mass communications as in almost every other field of enterprise, technological progress has hurt the Little Man and helped the Big Man. As lately as fifty years ago, every democratic country could boast of a great number of small journals and local newspapers. Thousands of country editors expressed thousands of independent
    opinions. Somewhere or other almost anybody could get almost anything printed. Today the press is still legally free; but most of the little papers have disappeared. The cost of wood-pulp, of modern printing machinery and of syndicated news is too high for the Little Man. In the totalitarian East there is political censorship, and the media of mass communication are controlled by the State. In the democratic West there is economic
    censorship and the media of mass communication are controlled by members of the Power Elite. Censorship by rising costs and the concentration of communication power in the hands of a few big concerns is less objectionable than State ownership and government propaganda; but certainly it is not something of which a Jeffersonian
    democrat could possibly approve. In regard to propaganda the early advocates of universal literacy and a free press envisaged only two possibilities: the propaganda might be true, or it might be false. They
    did not foresee what in fact has happened, above all in our Western capitalist democracies — the development of a vast mass communications industry, concerned in the main neither with the true nor the false, but with the unreal, the more or less totally irrelevant. in a word, they failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions.

    In the past most people never got a chance of fully satisfying this appetite. They might long for distractions, but the distractions were not provided. Christmas came but once a year, feasts were "solemn and rare," there were few readers and very little to read, and the nearest approach to a neighborhood movie theater was the parish church, where the performances, though frequent, were somewhat monotonous. For conditions even remotely comparable to those now prevailing we must return to imperial Rome, where the populace was kept in good humor by frequent, gratuitous doses of many kinds of entertainment — from poetical dramas to gladiatorial fights, from recitations of Virgil to
    all-out boxing, from concerts to military reviews and public executions.

    But even in Rome there was nothing like the non-stop distraction now provided by newspapers and magazines, by radio, television and the cinema. In Brave New World non-stop distractions of the most fascinating nature (the feelies, orgy-porgy, centrifugal bumble-puppy) are deliberately used as instalments of policy, for the purpose of preventing people from
    paying too much attention to the realities of the social and political situation. The other world of religion is different from the other world of entertainment; but they resemble one another in being most decidedly "not of this world." Both are distractions and, if lived in too continuously, both can become, in Marx's phrase, "the opium of the people" and so a threat to freedom. Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who are constantly and intelligently on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic procedures. A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time, not on the spot, not here and now and in the calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the encroachments of those who would
    manipulate and control it.

    In their propaganda today's dictators rely for the most part on repetition,
    suppression and rationalization — the repetition of catchwords which they wish to be accepted as true, the suppression of facts which they wish to be ignored, the arousal and rationalization of passions which may be used in the interests of the Party or the State. As the art and science of manipulation come to be better understood, the dictators of the future will doubtless learn to combine these techniques with the non-stop distractions which, in the West, are now threatening to drown in a sea of irrelevance the rational propaganda essential to the maintenance of individual liberty and the survival of democratic institutions."
    'PROPAGANDA IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY', Aldous Huxley, 'Brave New World Revisited' (1956) NOTE: This is a non-fiction follow-up look at the predictions and observations Huxley conveyed in Brave New World. The chapters on propaganda in both democratic and totalitarian societies are relevent today. https://archive.org/stream/Brave_New_World_Revisited/Brave%20New%20World%20Revisited%20-%20Huxley%20%281958%29_djvu.txt "Liberalism flourishes in an atmosphere of prosperity and declines as declining prosperity makes it necessary for the government to intervene ever more frequently and drastically in the affairs of its subjects...in the immediate future there is some reason to believe that the punitive methods of 1984 will give place to the reinforcements and manipulations of Brave New World...Propaganda in favor of action that is consonant with enlightened self-interest appeals to reason by means of logical arguments based upon the best available evidence fully and honestly set forth. Propaganda in favor of action dictated by the impulses that are below self-interest offers false, garbled or incomplete evidence, avoids logical argument and seeks to influence its victims by the mere repetition of catchwords, by the furious denunciation of foreign or domestic scapegoats, and by cunningly associating the lowest passions with the highest ideals, so that atrocities come to be perpetrated in the name of God and the most cynical kind of Realpolitik is treated as a matter of religious principle and patriotic duty." PROPAGANDA IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY "The doctrines of Europe," Jefferson wrote, "were that men in numerous associations cannot be restrained within the limits of order and justice, except by forces physical and moral wielded over them by authorities independent of their will. . . . We (the founders of the new American democracy) believe that man was a rational animal, endowed by nature with rights, and with an innate sense of justice, and that he could be restrained from wrong, and protected in right, by moderate powers, confided to persons of his own choice and held to their duties by dependence on his own will." To post- Freudian ears, this kind of language seems touchingly quaint and ingenuous. Human beings are a good deal less rational and innately just than the optimists of the eighteenth century supposed. On the other hand they are neither so morally blind nor so hopelessly unreasonable as the pessimists of the twentieth would have us believe. In spite of the Id and the Unconscious, in spite of endemic neurosis and the prevalence of low IQ's, most men and women are probably decent enough and sensible enough to be trusted with the direction of their own destinies. Democratic institutions are devices for reconciling social order with individual freedom and initiative, and for making the immediate power of a country's rulers subject to the ultimate power of the ruled. The fact that, in Western Europe and America, these devices have worked, all things considered, not too badly is proof enough that the eighteenth-century optimists were not entirely wrong. Given a fair chance, human beings can govern themselves, and govern themselves better, though perhaps with less mechanical efficiency, than they can be governed by "authorities independent of their will." Given a fair chance, I repeat; for the fair chance is an indispensable prerequisite. No people that passes abruptly from a state of subservience under the rule of a despot to the completely unfamiliar state of political independence can be said to have a fair chance of making democratic institutions work. Again, no people in a precarious economic condition has a fair chance of being able to govern itself democratically. Liberalism flourishes in an atmosphere of prosperity and declines as declining prosperity makes it necessary for the government to intervene ever more frequently and drastically in the affairs of its subjects. Over-population and over-organization are two conditions which, as I have already pointed out, deprive a society of a fair chance of making democratic institutions work effectively. We see, then, that there are certain historical,economic, demographic and technological conditions which make it very hard for Jefferson's rational animals, endowed by nature with inalienable rights and an innate sense of justice, to exercise their reason, claim their rights and act justly within a democratically organized society. We in the West have been supremely fortunate in having been given our fair chance of making the great experiment in self-government. Unfortunately it now looks as though, owing to recent changes in our circumstances, this infinitely precious fair chance were being, little by little, taken away from us. And this, of course, is not the whole story. These blind impersonal forces are not the only enemies of individual liberty and democratic institutions. There are also forces of another, less abstract character, forces that can be deliberately used by power-seeking individuals whose aim is to establish partial or complete control over their fellows. Fifty years ago, when I was a boy, it seemed completely self-evident that the bad old days were over, that torture and massacre, slavery, and the persecution of heretics, were things of the past. Among people who wore top hats, traveled in trains, and took a bath every morning such horrors were simply out of the question. After all, we were living in the twentieth century. A few years later these people who took daily baths and went to church in top hats were committing atrocities on a scale undreamed of by the benighted Africans and Asiatics. In the light of recent history it would be foolish to suppose that this sort of thing cannot happen again. It can and, no doubt, it will. But in the immediate future there is some reason to believe that the punitive methods of 1984 will give place to the reinforcements and manipulations of Brave New World. There are two kinds of propaganda — rational propaganda in favor of action that is consonant with the enlightened self-interest of those who make it and those to whom it is addressed, and non-rational propaganda that is not consonant with anybody's enlightened self-interest, but is dictated by, and appeals to, passion. Where the actions of individuals are concerned there are motives more exalted than enlightened self-interest, but where collective action has to be taken in the fields of politics and economics, enlightened self- interest is probably the highest of effective motives. If politicians and their constituents always acted to promote their own or their country's long-range self-interest, this world would be an earthly paradise. As it is, they often act against their own interests, merely to gratify their least creditable passions; the world, in consequence, is a place of misery. Propaganda in favor of action that is consonant with enlightened self-interest appeals to reason by means of logical arguments based upon the best available evidence fully and honestly set forth. Propaganda in favor of action dictated by the impulses that are below self-interest offers false, garbled or incomplete evidence, avoids logical argument and seeks to influence its victims by the mere repetition of catchwords, by the furious denunciation of foreign or domestic scapegoats, and by cunningly associating the lowest passions with the highest ideals, so that atrocities come to be perpetrated in the name of God and the most cynical kind of Realpolitik is treated as a matter of religious principle and patriotic duty. In John Dewey's words, "a renewal of faith in common human nature, in its potentialities in general, and in its power in particular to respond to reason and truth, is a surer bulwark against totalitarianism than a demonstration of material success or a devout worship of special legal and political forms." The power to respond to reason and truth exists in all of us. But so, unfortunately, does the tendency to respond to unreason and falsehood — particularly in those cases where the falsehood evokes some enjoyable emotion, or where the appeal to unreason strikes some answering chord in the primitive, subhuman depths of our being. In certain fields of activity men have learned to respond to reason and truth pretty consistently. The authors of learned articles do not appeal to the passions of their fellow scientists and technologists. They set forth what, to the best of their knowledge, is the truth about some particular aspect of reality, they use reason to explain the facts they have observed and they support their point of view with arguments that appeal to reason in other people. All this is fairly easy in the fields of physical science and technology. It is much more difficult in the fields of politics and religion and ethics. Here the relevant facts often elude us. As for the meaning of the facts, that of course depends upon the particular system of ideas, in terms of which you choose to interpret them. And these are not the only difficulties that confront the rational truth- seeker. In public and in private life, it often happens that there is simply no time to collect the relevant facts or to weigh their significance. We are forced to act on insufficient evidence and by a light considerably less steady than that of logic. With the best will in the world, we cannot always be completely truthful or consistently rational. All that is in our power is to be as truthful and rational as circumstances permit us to be, and to respond as well as we can to the limited truth and imperfect reasonings offered for our consideration by others. "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free," said Jefferson, "it expects what never was and never will be. . . . The people cannot be safe without information. Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe." Across the Atlantic another passionate believer in reason was thinking about the same time, in almost precisely similar terms. Here is what John Stuart Mill wrote of his father, the utilitarian philosopher, James Mill: "So complete was his reliance upon the influence of reason over the minds of mankind, whenever it is allowed to reach them, that he felt as if all would be gained, if the whole population were able to read, and if all sorts of opinions were allowed to be addressed to them by word or in writing, and if by the suffrage they could nominate a legislature to give effect to the opinions they had adopted." All is safe, all would be gained! Once more we hear the note of eighteenth-century optimism. Jefferson, it is true, was a realist as well as an optimist. He knew by bitter experience that the freedom of the press can be shamefully abused. "Nothing," he declared, "can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper." And yet, he insisted (and we can only agree with him), "within the pale of truth, the press is a noble institution, equally the friend of science and civil liberty." Mass communication, in a word, is neither good nor bad; it is simply a force and, like any other force, it can be used either well or ill. Used in one way, the press, the radio and the cinema are indispensable to the survival of democracy. Used in another way, they are among the most powerful weapons in the dictator's armory. In the field of mass communications as in almost every other field of enterprise, technological progress has hurt the Little Man and helped the Big Man. As lately as fifty years ago, every democratic country could boast of a great number of small journals and local newspapers. Thousands of country editors expressed thousands of independent opinions. Somewhere or other almost anybody could get almost anything printed. Today the press is still legally free; but most of the little papers have disappeared. The cost of wood-pulp, of modern printing machinery and of syndicated news is too high for the Little Man. In the totalitarian East there is political censorship, and the media of mass communication are controlled by the State. In the democratic West there is economic censorship and the media of mass communication are controlled by members of the Power Elite. Censorship by rising costs and the concentration of communication power in the hands of a few big concerns is less objectionable than State ownership and government propaganda; but certainly it is not something of which a Jeffersonian democrat could possibly approve. In regard to propaganda the early advocates of universal literacy and a free press envisaged only two possibilities: the propaganda might be true, or it might be false. They did not foresee what in fact has happened, above all in our Western capitalist democracies — the development of a vast mass communications industry, concerned in the main neither with the true nor the false, but with the unreal, the more or less totally irrelevant. in a word, they failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions. In the past most people never got a chance of fully satisfying this appetite. They might long for distractions, but the distractions were not provided. Christmas came but once a year, feasts were "solemn and rare," there were few readers and very little to read, and the nearest approach to a neighborhood movie theater was the parish church, where the performances, though frequent, were somewhat monotonous. For conditions even remotely comparable to those now prevailing we must return to imperial Rome, where the populace was kept in good humor by frequent, gratuitous doses of many kinds of entertainment — from poetical dramas to gladiatorial fights, from recitations of Virgil to all-out boxing, from concerts to military reviews and public executions. But even in Rome there was nothing like the non-stop distraction now provided by newspapers and magazines, by radio, television and the cinema. In Brave New World non-stop distractions of the most fascinating nature (the feelies, orgy-porgy, centrifugal bumble-puppy) are deliberately used as instalments of policy, for the purpose of preventing people from paying too much attention to the realities of the social and political situation. The other world of religion is different from the other world of entertainment; but they resemble one another in being most decidedly "not of this world." Both are distractions and, if lived in too continuously, both can become, in Marx's phrase, "the opium of the people" and so a threat to freedom. Only the vigilant can maintain their liberties, and only those who are constantly and intelligently on the spot can hope to govern themselves effectively by democratic procedures. A society, most of whose members spend a great part of their time, not on the spot, not here and now and in the calculable future, but somewhere else, in the irrelevant other worlds of sport and soap opera, of mythology and metaphysical fantasy, will find it hard to resist the encroachments of those who would manipulate and control it. In their propaganda today's dictators rely for the most part on repetition, suppression and rationalization — the repetition of catchwords which they wish to be accepted as true, the suppression of facts which they wish to be ignored, the arousal and rationalization of passions which may be used in the interests of the Party or the State. As the art and science of manipulation come to be better understood, the dictators of the future will doubtless learn to combine these techniques with the non-stop distractions which, in the West, are now threatening to drown in a sea of irrelevance the rational propaganda essential to the maintenance of individual liberty and the survival of democratic institutions."
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares
  • SATELLITES IN IONOSPHERE DISRUPT BIO-ELECTRIC CURRENTS

    ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG

    http://cellphonetaskforce.org

    NOTE: This is of particular importance right now as Elon Musk's SpaceX has put up over 1,000 5G satellites and more going up all the time, with a goal of over 20,000 to cover all inhabited areas of the Earth. 5G is military in nature and is intimately related to the nano-technologies now known to be present in the Covid 'vaccines.'

    "The harm from satellites is not due primarily to the radiation levels at the earth’s surface. The satellites are in low orbits, but they are still hundreds of miles above us, and the levels of radiation they expose us to here on the ground are at most about 0.00001 μW/cm2. That is about one-millionth of the levels we are exposed to from cell phones, computers and cell towers.

    The threat to life comes instead from the fact that all these satellites are located in the ionosphere. The ionosphere is a source of high voltage that controls the global electric circuit, which in turn provides the energy for life. A brief discussion of the science can be found in my 2018 article, 'Planetary Emergency'.

    Those who wish more detail may wish to consult chapter 9 of my book, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life, and the bibliography supplied with that chapter. That chapter is titled 'Earth’s Electric Envelope.' "
    SATELLITES IN IONOSPHERE DISRUPT BIO-ELECTRIC CURRENTS ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG http://cellphonetaskforce.org NOTE: This is of particular importance right now as Elon Musk's SpaceX has put up over 1,000 5G satellites and more going up all the time, with a goal of over 20,000 to cover all inhabited areas of the Earth. 5G is military in nature and is intimately related to the nano-technologies now known to be present in the Covid 'vaccines.' "The harm from satellites is not due primarily to the radiation levels at the earth’s surface. The satellites are in low orbits, but they are still hundreds of miles above us, and the levels of radiation they expose us to here on the ground are at most about 0.00001 μW/cm2. That is about one-millionth of the levels we are exposed to from cell phones, computers and cell towers. The threat to life comes instead from the fact that all these satellites are located in the ionosphere. The ionosphere is a source of high voltage that controls the global electric circuit, which in turn provides the energy for life. A brief discussion of the science can be found in my 2018 article, 'Planetary Emergency'. Those who wish more detail may wish to consult chapter 9 of my book, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life, and the bibliography supplied with that chapter. That chapter is titled 'Earth’s Electric Envelope.' "
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • AFTER YOU TURN IT OFF...OR BETTER YET, DESTROY IT AND DISPOSE OF PROPERLY, THEN

    REGAIN YOUR BRAIN :)

    http://regainyourbrain.org
    AFTER YOU TURN IT OFF...OR BETTER YET, DESTROY IT AND DISPOSE OF PROPERLY, THEN REGAIN YOUR BRAIN :) http://regainyourbrain.org
    Please turn off your tv's...
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • NAVAL ELECTRONIC WARFARE SATURATING HAWAI'I NOW [but this is on-going anywhere US, NATO or any other military presence exists]

    https://geo-terrorism.blogspot.com/

    Every naval vessel of any size, regardless of what country they are from, has an enormous array of all kinds of EMR (electromagnetic radiative) devices and technologies, for 'overt' purposes of command, control, communication, tracking, surveillance and 'actual' weapons systems. The ONR (Office of Naval Research) in conjunction with DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) are on the cutting edge of totally 'science fiction' weapons involving extraordinarily high powered lasers, acoustic beams and microwaves. In the same way that carbon dioxide is like 'oxygen for plants', microwaves are the 'oxygen' of all things military. They are that ubiquitous.

    Beyond even this, all vessels of any size have electrified hulls that irradiate the ocean anywhere in their vicinity for the purpose of 'reducing salt-water corrosion.' The people on these naval vessels are quite literally being cooked by all this...while being told that it's 'at safe levels.' I have personally felt the energetic 'presence' of a major US Navy war ship, the USS Pearl Harbour (LSD 52) arrived in Darwin NT in 2010 for a week. The whole week, my partner and I felt as if a 'dark cloud' of microwave emissions was bearing down on the whole city...it made the overall mood dark and gloomy. This lifted as soon as the ship left. We even saw sailors at the local internet place, I asked them about this and their pat response was 'We aren't allowed to talk about the ship.' The huge white dome thing you see in one of these photos is in fact a huge SBX phased-array antenna mounted on a Norwegian floating oil-rig, one of six built by Boeing. These are 'mobile HAARP' transmitters, 'officially' used for communication, just as the atomic bomb is used for 'keeping peace.' Interestingly, one of these had been towed by the USS Ronald Reagan to the Sea of Japan and was there exactly when the whole Fukushima thing happened.

    WAKE UP PEOPLE. The global military-industrial juggernaut is NOT here to protect you. Au contraire mes amies...it exists to do its masters' bidding of FACILITATING

    DEPOPULATION...indiscriminately, on air, land and sea. With emphasis on 'the people of the sea.'
    NAVAL ELECTRONIC WARFARE SATURATING HAWAI'I NOW [but this is on-going anywhere US, NATO or any other military presence exists] https://geo-terrorism.blogspot.com/ Every naval vessel of any size, regardless of what country they are from, has an enormous array of all kinds of EMR (electromagnetic radiative) devices and technologies, for 'overt' purposes of command, control, communication, tracking, surveillance and 'actual' weapons systems. The ONR (Office of Naval Research) in conjunction with DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) are on the cutting edge of totally 'science fiction' weapons involving extraordinarily high powered lasers, acoustic beams and microwaves. In the same way that carbon dioxide is like 'oxygen for plants', microwaves are the 'oxygen' of all things military. They are that ubiquitous. Beyond even this, all vessels of any size have electrified hulls that irradiate the ocean anywhere in their vicinity for the purpose of 'reducing salt-water corrosion.' The people on these naval vessels are quite literally being cooked by all this...while being told that it's 'at safe levels.' I have personally felt the energetic 'presence' of a major US Navy war ship, the USS Pearl Harbour (LSD 52) arrived in Darwin NT in 2010 for a week. The whole week, my partner and I felt as if a 'dark cloud' of microwave emissions was bearing down on the whole city...it made the overall mood dark and gloomy. This lifted as soon as the ship left. We even saw sailors at the local internet place, I asked them about this and their pat response was 'We aren't allowed to talk about the ship.' The huge white dome thing you see in one of these photos is in fact a huge SBX phased-array antenna mounted on a Norwegian floating oil-rig, one of six built by Boeing. These are 'mobile HAARP' transmitters, 'officially' used for communication, just as the atomic bomb is used for 'keeping peace.' Interestingly, one of these had been towed by the USS Ronald Reagan to the Sea of Japan and was there exactly when the whole Fukushima thing happened. WAKE UP PEOPLE. The global military-industrial juggernaut is NOT here to protect you. Au contraire mes amies...it exists to do its masters' bidding of FACILITATING DEPOPULATION...indiscriminately, on air, land and sea. With emphasis on 'the people of the sea.'
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
More Stories