The New Zealand Outdoors-Freedom Party is your alternative political party. If you have serious concerns about New Zealand government giving more power to corporations than to normal kiwis, if you're worried that 1080 poison may be causing more harm than good, if you think that 5G needs to be properly tested for health for humans and animals before rolling out over our country and that we should be able to decline vaccination without being discriminated against, that we need holistic, natural medicine running alongside conventional and pharmaceutical medicine - then join our page, join our movement to put pressure on government to legislate in the public interest, and to grow big enough to be able to campaign successfully in the 2023 elections. Support our kaupapa - become a member at www.outdoorsparty.co.nz/join/
Recent Updates
  • Breakthrough Study Shows Unvaccinated Children Are Healthier

    Jeremy R. Hammond <newsletter@jeremyrhammond.com>

    (I'm KJG, and on Hammond's email list!)

    Hi KJG,
    As you know if you've read my book The War on Informed Consent, renowned pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas and Dr. James Lyons-Weiler published a study using Dr. Thomas's patient data showing that his unvaccinated patients were the healthiest children in his practice.

    Days after that study was published, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas's license on the false pretext that his approach of respecting parents' right to informed consent constituted an "emergency" threat to public health. The board took this action despite the study having been done in response to a demand from the board for Dr. Thomas to produce peer-reviewed evidence to support his alternative approach of not pushing strict compliance with the CDC's schedule.

    That study was later retracted by the publishing journal on the grounds that its findings were the spurious result of a selection bias. Specifically, the claim was made that the findings do not reflect a true effect of non-vaccination but were rather due to parents of unvaccinated children simply failing to take their kids in to see the doctor and therefore failing to get their equally unhealthy kids diagnosed and treated for various health conditions.

    Now, Dr. Lyons-Weiler, along with Dr. Russell Blaylock (since Dr. Thomas remains prohibited from conducting further research by the medical board), has published a follow-up study thoroughly refuting the claim that their findings were an artifact of differing healthcare-seeking behaviors.

    The new study shows conclusively that parents of unvaccinated children took their kids in for routine checkups just as much as parents of vaccinated children. In fact, unvaccinated children were even more consistently attendant at routine visits than vaccinated children.

    This falsifies the speculative hypothesis upon which the retraction was based, demonstrating how the journal editors' decision was not based on rational scientific inquiry and discourse but was instead politically motivated.

    I review the context and the study findings in my latest article. Please share this important information!
    Learn how the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study was fraudulently retracted!
    If you haven't yet read my book The War on Informed Consent, it not only tells the story of Dr. Thomas's heroic stand against the thoroughly corrupt "public health" establishment but also puts this episode into historical context, revealing the big picture of how the establishment seeks to punish both parents who choose not to strictly comply with the CDC schedule and physicians who respect those parents' right to make their own informed choices.

    It features a Foreword by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who has described me as "a brilliant and accomplished journalist" and the book as "an extraordinary and riveting dissection of Dr. Paul Thomas's medical board lynching".
    Order a signed copy of The War on Informed Consent.
    If you find this knowledge empowering and would like to help support my work, which is dependent on financial contributions from readers, please consider donating to my monthly fundraiser:
    Make a one-time or recurring donation today!
    In Solidarity,
    Jeremy R. Hammond
    Independent Journalist and Author
    JeremyRHammond.com
    Breakthrough Study Shows Unvaccinated Children Are Healthier Jeremy R. Hammond <newsletter@jeremyrhammond.com> (I'm KJG, and on Hammond's email list!) Hi KJG, As you know if you've read my book The War on Informed Consent, renowned pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas and Dr. James Lyons-Weiler published a study using Dr. Thomas's patient data showing that his unvaccinated patients were the healthiest children in his practice. Days after that study was published, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas's license on the false pretext that his approach of respecting parents' right to informed consent constituted an "emergency" threat to public health. The board took this action despite the study having been done in response to a demand from the board for Dr. Thomas to produce peer-reviewed evidence to support his alternative approach of not pushing strict compliance with the CDC's schedule. That study was later retracted by the publishing journal on the grounds that its findings were the spurious result of a selection bias. Specifically, the claim was made that the findings do not reflect a true effect of non-vaccination but were rather due to parents of unvaccinated children simply failing to take their kids in to see the doctor and therefore failing to get their equally unhealthy kids diagnosed and treated for various health conditions. Now, Dr. Lyons-Weiler, along with Dr. Russell Blaylock (since Dr. Thomas remains prohibited from conducting further research by the medical board), has published a follow-up study thoroughly refuting the claim that their findings were an artifact of differing healthcare-seeking behaviors. The new study shows conclusively that parents of unvaccinated children took their kids in for routine checkups just as much as parents of vaccinated children. In fact, unvaccinated children were even more consistently attendant at routine visits than vaccinated children. This falsifies the speculative hypothesis upon which the retraction was based, demonstrating how the journal editors' decision was not based on rational scientific inquiry and discourse but was instead politically motivated. I review the context and the study findings in my latest article. Please share this important information! Learn how the vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study was fraudulently retracted! If you haven't yet read my book The War on Informed Consent, it not only tells the story of Dr. Thomas's heroic stand against the thoroughly corrupt "public health" establishment but also puts this episode into historical context, revealing the big picture of how the establishment seeks to punish both parents who choose not to strictly comply with the CDC schedule and physicians who respect those parents' right to make their own informed choices. It features a Foreword by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who has described me as "a brilliant and accomplished journalist" and the book as "an extraordinary and riveting dissection of Dr. Paul Thomas's medical board lynching". Order a signed copy of The War on Informed Consent. If you find this knowledge empowering and would like to help support my work, which is dependent on financial contributions from readers, please consider donating to my monthly fundraiser: Make a one-time or recurring donation today! In Solidarity, Jeremy R. Hammond Independent Journalist and Author JeremyRHammond.com
    3
    1 Comments 0 Shares
  • Jeremy Hammond calls out "the cancer in the health freedom movement" :

    (Email newsletter: KJG is me!)

    Hi KJG,
    After the authoritarian lockdown measures were implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, I observed two broad strategies adopted by various factions within the health freedom movement for how to confront the existential medical tyranny.

    The first strategy I saw being used to was to try to shift public opinion away from support for or acquiescence to this authoritarianism by demonstrating how the claims being made to justify these extreme policies were demonstrably false. This was the camp that I fell into.

    For example, we pointed out that, far from being "the science", these measures were undertaken despite decades of research into pandemic preparedness concluding that the effectiveness of such measures are unsupported by scientific evidence.

    The second strategy I saw being used was to lazily claim that none of these measures make any sense because viruses do not exist.

    The people adopting this latter approach contributed nothing in the way of helping to produce effective arguments to get our message of freedom through to the masses of people who had been deceived by the government propaganda and either cheered the authoritarianism or felt conflicted about whether such extreme responses were justified.

    While we were busy informing the public, for example, that the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 induced by mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is potentially pathogenic and toxic, which explains the nature of observed adverse events including myocarditis, they were busy communicating the message that the vaccines couldn't possibly cause human cells to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein since SARS-CoV-2 doesn't exist.

    While we were busy informing the public about the importance of host factors in the pathogenesis of disease and the importance of healthy lifestyle choices, including maintenance of vitamin D sufficiency, to reduce the risk of severe COVID-19, they were busy communicating the message that there is nothing you can do to support your immune system's defenses against SARS-CoV-2 since SARS-CoV-2 doesn't exist.

    They have been a drag on the movement, holding us back from where we need to be.

    In case any of my own readers were wondering, that is why I have taken time to logically dismantle the foundations of their belief system by systematically and thoroughly demonstrating the factual and logical errors of their arguments.

    I have a vision of a world in which we are all able to make our own informed choices about our own health, or our children's health, free from any kind of coercion. The virus deniers are simply standing in the way of that goal.

    As one of my readers alerted me in the comments on my latest article, in which I once again demonstrate the false claims and mischaracterizations of sources coming from Tom Cowan, one of the leading propagators of the claim that viruses do not exist, someone Bill Huston published a Substack article attacking me for having published my article.

    In it, I noted that Tom Cowan had falsely claimed that I called him "a cancer" in the health freedom movement. I published the full context of my statement, showing how I had note done so.

    Huston does not even attempt to identify any factual or logical errors in any of my arguments in any of the content I have published on the topic of virus denialism. Instead, he calls me names, makes up lies about me (including absurdly lying that I "admit" in my article that did engage in name-calling against Cowan), and even goes so far as to propose the lunatic conspiracy theory that Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and I are in collaboration to push Big Pharma's agenda.

    My first reaction to this mindless rubbish was that it wasn't worth my time to respond to. But then I realized that Huston's article provided a perfect illustration of what I had meant when I said that there is a cancer within the health freedom movement. The irony was too rich not to make a public demonstration out of it.

    Also, Huston made false claims requiring me to set the record straight about my relationship with Bobby Kennedy and Children's Health Defense (CHD).

    Therefore, I have published an update to my article in which I address Huston's attacks on me and CHD. Here is the concluding paragraph:

    "In conclusion, Huston’s vain attack on me perfectly illustrates what I meant about there being a cancer in the health freedom movement. Such cultish behavior, hateful divisiveness, and intellectual dishonesty truly have no place in our efforts to combat the system of medical authoritarianism."
    Read my article illuminating the cancer in the freedom movement.
    If you've already read that article of mine and just want to read the update, you can jump there using this bookmark link from the table of contents
    While I understand why many readers who share my view might think I am wasting my time confronting the "no virus" claims, hopefully, by reading my response to Huston's lies, you will deeply understand why I have come to recognize my mistake of having remained too silent for too long, and why I have more recently come to devote considerable labor to correcting the false claims.

    As you can learn that update, I have taken a lot of flak for taking a public stance against the harmful false claims emanating from within the movement. I have lost many subscribers who became angered by my having shared information that conflicted with the belief system that they had been indoctrinated into by the viral misinformation.

    So, you can understand my sense of incredible gratitude to all those of you who have stuck with me, maintained interest in my work, and continued to receive my newsletters.

    I am especially grateful for those of you who have continued to support my work by donating to my monthly fundraisers. I will continue to do my best to deserve this financial support by delivering informational content of the highest quality, journalistic integrity, and intellectual honesty. Truly, thank you.
    If you value my contributions to the health freedom movement and would like to support my work:
    Make a one-time or automatically recurring donation today!
    In Solidarity,
    Jeremy R. Hammond
    Independent Journalist and Author
    JeremyRHammond.com

    Follow Me on Social Media
    Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn [CENSORED!] | MeWe | Gab | GETTR | Minds | Parler | Telegram
    Jeremy Hammond calls out "the cancer in the health freedom movement" : (Email newsletter: KJG is me!) Hi KJG, After the authoritarian lockdown measures were implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, I observed two broad strategies adopted by various factions within the health freedom movement for how to confront the existential medical tyranny. The first strategy I saw being used to was to try to shift public opinion away from support for or acquiescence to this authoritarianism by demonstrating how the claims being made to justify these extreme policies were demonstrably false. This was the camp that I fell into. For example, we pointed out that, far from being "the science", these measures were undertaken despite decades of research into pandemic preparedness concluding that the effectiveness of such measures are unsupported by scientific evidence. The second strategy I saw being used was to lazily claim that none of these measures make any sense because viruses do not exist. The people adopting this latter approach contributed nothing in the way of helping to produce effective arguments to get our message of freedom through to the masses of people who had been deceived by the government propaganda and either cheered the authoritarianism or felt conflicted about whether such extreme responses were justified. While we were busy informing the public, for example, that the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 induced by mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is potentially pathogenic and toxic, which explains the nature of observed adverse events including myocarditis, they were busy communicating the message that the vaccines couldn't possibly cause human cells to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein since SARS-CoV-2 doesn't exist. While we were busy informing the public about the importance of host factors in the pathogenesis of disease and the importance of healthy lifestyle choices, including maintenance of vitamin D sufficiency, to reduce the risk of severe COVID-19, they were busy communicating the message that there is nothing you can do to support your immune system's defenses against SARS-CoV-2 since SARS-CoV-2 doesn't exist. They have been a drag on the movement, holding us back from where we need to be. In case any of my own readers were wondering, that is why I have taken time to logically dismantle the foundations of their belief system by systematically and thoroughly demonstrating the factual and logical errors of their arguments. I have a vision of a world in which we are all able to make our own informed choices about our own health, or our children's health, free from any kind of coercion. The virus deniers are simply standing in the way of that goal. As one of my readers alerted me in the comments on my latest article, in which I once again demonstrate the false claims and mischaracterizations of sources coming from Tom Cowan, one of the leading propagators of the claim that viruses do not exist, someone Bill Huston published a Substack article attacking me for having published my article. In it, I noted that Tom Cowan had falsely claimed that I called him "a cancer" in the health freedom movement. I published the full context of my statement, showing how I had note done so. Huston does not even attempt to identify any factual or logical errors in any of my arguments in any of the content I have published on the topic of virus denialism. Instead, he calls me names, makes up lies about me (including absurdly lying that I "admit" in my article that did engage in name-calling against Cowan), and even goes so far as to propose the lunatic conspiracy theory that Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and I are in collaboration to push Big Pharma's agenda. My first reaction to this mindless rubbish was that it wasn't worth my time to respond to. But then I realized that Huston's article provided a perfect illustration of what I had meant when I said that there is a cancer within the health freedom movement. The irony was too rich not to make a public demonstration out of it. Also, Huston made false claims requiring me to set the record straight about my relationship with Bobby Kennedy and Children's Health Defense (CHD). Therefore, I have published an update to my article in which I address Huston's attacks on me and CHD. Here is the concluding paragraph: "In conclusion, Huston’s vain attack on me perfectly illustrates what I meant about there being a cancer in the health freedom movement. Such cultish behavior, hateful divisiveness, and intellectual dishonesty truly have no place in our efforts to combat the system of medical authoritarianism." Read my article illuminating the cancer in the freedom movement. If you've already read that article of mine and just want to read the update, you can jump there using this bookmark link from the table of contents While I understand why many readers who share my view might think I am wasting my time confronting the "no virus" claims, hopefully, by reading my response to Huston's lies, you will deeply understand why I have come to recognize my mistake of having remained too silent for too long, and why I have more recently come to devote considerable labor to correcting the false claims. As you can learn that update, I have taken a lot of flak for taking a public stance against the harmful false claims emanating from within the movement. I have lost many subscribers who became angered by my having shared information that conflicted with the belief system that they had been indoctrinated into by the viral misinformation. So, you can understand my sense of incredible gratitude to all those of you who have stuck with me, maintained interest in my work, and continued to receive my newsletters. I am especially grateful for those of you who have continued to support my work by donating to my monthly fundraisers. I will continue to do my best to deserve this financial support by delivering informational content of the highest quality, journalistic integrity, and intellectual honesty. Truly, thank you. If you value my contributions to the health freedom movement and would like to support my work: Make a one-time or automatically recurring donation today! In Solidarity, Jeremy R. Hammond Independent Journalist and Author JeremyRHammond.com Follow Me on Social Media Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn [CENSORED!] | MeWe | Gab | GETTR | Minds | Parler | Telegram
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • A new positive group "in the fight" :
    https://www.floraandfaunaaotearoa.co.nz/
    A new positive group "in the fight" : https://www.floraandfaunaaotearoa.co.nz/
    WWW.FLORAANDFAUNAAOTEAROA.CO.NZ
    A Brave new voice for all creatures, great and small. - Flora and Fauna of Aotearoa
    Support or get involved in our current projects… The People’s Inquiry: The People’s Inquiry into the Impacts and Effects of Toxic Chemicals and Poisons on our People, Wildlife and Environment – Te Uiuinga e pā ana ki nga Pātanga me nga Tukinotanga a nga Matū Tāoke me nga Paitini ki ngā Tāngata, nga Kararehe Kōwao [&hellip;]
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • 1080 and Brodifacoum: Jane Goodall Institute:
    https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/AK2209/S00371/jane-goodall-institute-slams-predator-free-2050-and-aerial-poison-campaigns-as-unethical.htm
    1080 and Brodifacoum: Jane Goodall Institute: https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/AK2209/S00371/jane-goodall-institute-slams-predator-free-2050-and-aerial-poison-campaigns-as-unethical.htm
    WWW.SCOOP.CO.NZ
    Jane Goodall Institute Slams Predator Free 2050 And Aerial Poison Campaigns As Unethical | Scoop News
    Flora and Fauna of Aotearoa welcomes the release of a new paper published by the Jane Goodall Institute and Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences at Ghent University in Belgium. The Ethical Cost of Predator Free New Zealand 2050: Suffering in the ...
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Gov continues its rolling updates that shows how poorly its vax performs: Beyond belief anyone still accepts this:
    https://www.health.govt.nz/covid-19-novel-coronavirus/covid-19-data-and-statistics/covid-19-case-demographics#deaths
    Gov continues its rolling updates that shows how poorly its vax performs: Beyond belief anyone still accepts this: https://www.health.govt.nz/covid-19-novel-coronavirus/covid-19-data-and-statistics/covid-19-case-demographics#deaths
    WWW.HEALTH.GOVT.NZ
    COVID-19: Case demographics
    Information about who has been affected by COVID-19 in New Zealand.
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • The Alarming Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccines for Children:
    https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2022/09/19/the-alarming-consequences-of-covid-19-vaccines-for-children/
    The Alarming Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccines for Children: https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2022/09/19/the-alarming-consequences-of-covid-19-vaccines-for-children/
    WWW.JEREMYRHAMMOND.COM
    The Alarming Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccines for Children
    New data suggest that COVID-19 vaccines have a detrimental long-term effect on children’s immune systems regardless of prior infection.
    1
    1 Comments 0 Shares
  • The terror of publishing Nicky Hager:
    https://www.newsroom.co.nz/readingroom/the-terror-of-publishing-nicky-hager
    The terror of publishing Nicky Hager: https://www.newsroom.co.nz/readingroom/the-terror-of-publishing-nicky-hager
    WWW.NEWSROOM.CO.NZ
    The terror of publishing Nicky Hager
    "Every book could destroy the company", writes Nicky Hager's publisher
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • A call-out to ALL SILENT doctors, including in New Zealand, who in their silence have been complicit to the most horrific abuses on people's lives by its scale of devastation, and the concerted efforts to dominate people with false science, deceptive medical intelligence, and corrupt pharmaceutical veracity, that has ever been used in medical pracitse in human history:
    https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/blog/open-letter-silent-doctor/
    A call-out to ALL SILENT doctors, including in New Zealand, who in their silence have been complicit to the most horrific abuses on people's lives by its scale of devastation, and the concerted efforts to dominate people with false science, deceptive medical intelligence, and corrupt pharmaceutical veracity, that has ever been used in medical pracitse in human history: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/blog/open-letter-silent-doctor/
    WORLDCOUNCILFORHEALTH.ORG
    An Open Letter to the Silent Doctor
    The profession of medicine is a noble one, but only if informed consent and the principle of “first, do no harm” are upheld.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Liz Gunn interviews Dr Dooley: Shattering revelations concerning control of medical system in NZ: https://rumble.com/v1lbjvd-the-dark-truth-of-americas-federation-of-state-medical-boards.html
    Liz Gunn interviews Dr Dooley: Shattering revelations concerning control of medical system in NZ: https://rumble.com/v1lbjvd-the-dark-truth-of-americas-federation-of-state-medical-boards.html
    RUMBLE.COM
    The Dark Truth of America's Federation Of State Medical Boards
    Is the FSMB the "enforcement arm" for Big Pharma? Few doctors realise that FSMB directives from this private US organisation have influenced how medicine has been practised around the world since 1913
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • [[ Saving this here, just in case! ]] .............................................................

    CALLING FOR SACKING from all MSM appearances of Baker, Wiles, and too Bloomfield should he have stuck around and not be ducking for cover. Simple and condemning facts are below!

    [ Dear Facebook,
    this is a legitimate political post on a registered NZ political party page that currently still has legal and moral rights, in what is allegedly still a free representative democratic nation, to speak out on severe issues. Leave our posts alone!
    - KJG
    One of this page Admin ]

    I am, as a single party member, personally (and not The Party) responsible for this call for the removal and denial of Michael Baker, Siouxsie Wiles, and retiring (not too soon!) Ashley Bloomfield from ALL future New Zealand wide presentations on any MSM (media).

    This call is due to finding chronic unprofessional denial of facts on many levels over the past 2 years amounting to a belief that continuous dishonest conduct has occured. However, specifically the one issue here today: The pushing of a medication on all the population of New Zealand that early on data showed clear evidence that it did not work. The stats we have TODAY point emphatically to this conclusion.
    We now clearly have whole NZ population data, being epidemiological data, that the "medication" DOES NOT WORK and indeed a small percentage variation suggests that those UN-medicated ARE AT LESS RISK FROM DE*TH than those medicated !

    This flies in the face of relentless "medical propaganda" we have been subjected to for 2 years and ongoing. Including, that the "un" are at many times risk of de*th compared to the "done"; That those not "done" are the major spreaders and to be isolated and feared and sacked (abused, in a society that was by design actively purposefully divided); That being "done" you are much less likely to di* and you are safe and will not spread it. All a concerted relentless pack of lies.
    BUT DON'T JUST TAKE MY SUMMATION BELOW, TAKE A LOOK AT THE RAW DATA-FACTS AND YOU WILL SEE IT AND WORK IT OUT FOR YOURSELF! Go to "Comments" and "First comment".

    This member Outdoors & Freedom Party calls for a halt to all m*R*N*A medic*tions in use in NZ right now and an IMMEDIATE INDEPENDENT public inquiry into the whole "single source of truth" single medic*tion charade. Bloomfield to be subpoeaned back from "retirement" for inquiry interrogation.
    If an inquiry is not called for immediately, ANYONE want to take this Gov to court ... again ... and put this nation out of its misery with these fools continuing to hold onto the reins?

    Dear Members: What level is your "had-enough" Meter at now?

    GO TO "FIRST COMMENT" in comments below, and you decide ... make up your own mind.

    - KJG
    [[ Saving this here, just in case! ]] ............................................................. CALLING FOR SACKING from all MSM appearances of Baker, Wiles, and too Bloomfield should he have stuck around and not be ducking for cover. Simple and condemning facts are below! [ Dear Facebook, this is a legitimate political post on a registered NZ political party page that currently still has legal and moral rights, in what is allegedly still a free representative democratic nation, to speak out on severe issues. Leave our posts alone! - KJG One of this page Admin ] I am, as a single party member, personally (and not The Party) responsible for this call for the removal and denial of Michael Baker, Siouxsie Wiles, and retiring (not too soon!) Ashley Bloomfield from ALL future New Zealand wide presentations on any MSM (media). This call is due to finding chronic unprofessional denial of facts on many levels over the past 2 years amounting to a belief that continuous dishonest conduct has occured. However, specifically the one issue here today: The pushing of a medication on all the population of New Zealand that early on data showed clear evidence that it did not work. The stats we have TODAY point emphatically to this conclusion. We now clearly have whole NZ population data, being epidemiological data, that the "medication" DOES NOT WORK and indeed a small percentage variation suggests that those UN-medicated ARE AT LESS RISK FROM DE*TH than those medicated ! This flies in the face of relentless "medical propaganda" we have been subjected to for 2 years and ongoing. Including, that the "un" are at many times risk of de*th compared to the "done"; That those not "done" are the major spreaders and to be isolated and feared and sacked (abused, in a society that was by design actively purposefully divided); That being "done" you are much less likely to di* and you are safe and will not spread it. All a concerted relentless pack of lies. BUT DON'T JUST TAKE MY SUMMATION BELOW, TAKE A LOOK AT THE RAW DATA-FACTS AND YOU WILL SEE IT AND WORK IT OUT FOR YOURSELF! Go to "Comments" and "First comment". This member Outdoors & Freedom Party calls for a halt to all m*R*N*A medic*tions in use in NZ right now and an IMMEDIATE INDEPENDENT public inquiry into the whole "single source of truth" single medic*tion charade. Bloomfield to be subpoeaned back from "retirement" for inquiry interrogation. If an inquiry is not called for immediately, ANYONE want to take this Gov to court ... again ... and put this nation out of its misery with these fools continuing to hold onto the reins? Dear Members: What level is your "had-enough" Meter at now? GO TO "FIRST COMMENT" in comments below, and you decide ... make up your own mind. - KJG
    3
    0 Comments 0 Shares
More Stories