Recent Updates
  • 2
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Marsden Point Pipes Being Filled with Concrete
    – Blatant Economic Treason

    by Press Release 22 March, 2022


    New Zealand First Media


    “The revelation that the government is allowing the Marsden Point Oil Refinery pipes to be filled with concrete shows an astonishing level of economic ignorance,” says Rt Hon Winston Peters Leader of New Zealand First.


    “At a time when we have massive shortages of supply, a looming economic crisis, and prices of oil and other essential materials going through the roof, Labour is allowing this kind of short-sighted jingoistic behaviour to occur by a foreign company on kiwi soil.”


    “The simple fact is New Zealand needs to be open to looking at all options moving into the future that could give us economic flexibility and certainty to achieve a degree of self-sufficiency.”


    “This removal of any future use of these pipes at Marsden Point is not a part of the decommissioning process – it is a private company being allowed to commit blatant economic treason,” says Mr Peters.


    “The Energy and Resources Minister Megan Woods needs to explain how this can be occurring under her nose at such an important and economically fragile time in our country.”

    Marsden Point Pipes Being Filled with Concrete – Blatant Economic Treason by Press Release 22 March, 2022 New Zealand First Media “The revelation that the government is allowing the Marsden Point Oil Refinery pipes to be filled with concrete shows an astonishing level of economic ignorance,” says Rt Hon Winston Peters Leader of New Zealand First. “At a time when we have massive shortages of supply, a looming economic crisis, and prices of oil and other essential materials going through the roof, Labour is allowing this kind of short-sighted jingoistic behaviour to occur by a foreign company on kiwi soil.” “The simple fact is New Zealand needs to be open to looking at all options moving into the future that could give us economic flexibility and certainty to achieve a degree of self-sufficiency.” “This removal of any future use of these pipes at Marsden Point is not a part of the decommissioning process – it is a private company being allowed to commit blatant economic treason,” says Mr Peters. “The Energy and Resources Minister Megan Woods needs to explain how this can be occurring under her nose at such an important and economically fragile time in our country.”
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • NZ’s Government Lied about the Safety of the Covid19 Vaccines
    by Admin AntMarch 25, 2022
    A US regional clinical trial director has filed a $2 Billion USD lawsuit against Pfizer for faking its trial data and publishing fraudulent safety claims about its highly experimental Covid19 vaccine.

    Pfizer’s CEO has stated to shareholders that they will lose billions in revenue and share value from that US court case (and however many more after it globally) as he knows the truth.

    Prior to Covid19, Pfizer was rated the least trustworthy of corporations in the least trusted industry due to an historic amount of court fines – over $4 Billion USD for attempting to hide the harm and deaths from other products it lied about the safety of but still sold, including a charge of bribing a grand jury.

    ——————

    This government knew that, and it knew that it only received enough Pfizer Covid19 vaccine supply suddenly because India etc rejected it based on suspecting Pfizer lied about its trials and because it would not allow localised trials by governments to confirm its efficacy and safety claims.

    This government and PM also ignored MedSafe’s warnings that the Pfizer vaccine had 58 serious issues with it, but pushed it on NZers anyways and lied about its safety.

    MedSafe’s latest adverse reactions report and NZ doctors estimate over 160,000 NZers and increasing per day, have serious – life threatening and shortening adverse reactions to this vaccine.

    ACC is overwhelmed by increasing adverse reactions injury claims from this vaccine and has already approved 1,996 claims.

    The UK government ceased all mandates because its own data proved the vaccine had negative efficacy and a UK Police case regarding that had got to the international criminal court in The Hague.

    NZ’s government and agencies have breached the NZ Bill of Rights and gone against the medical science according to the recent court case that ruled mandates illegal for the Police and Army, and they have breached the Nuremberg Code.

    https://planetb-media.com/2022/03/25/nzs-government-lied-about-the-safety-of-the-covid19-vaccines/
    NZ’s Government Lied about the Safety of the Covid19 Vaccines by Admin AntMarch 25, 2022 A US regional clinical trial director has filed a $2 Billion USD lawsuit against Pfizer for faking its trial data and publishing fraudulent safety claims about its highly experimental Covid19 vaccine. Pfizer’s CEO has stated to shareholders that they will lose billions in revenue and share value from that US court case (and however many more after it globally) as he knows the truth. Prior to Covid19, Pfizer was rated the least trustworthy of corporations in the least trusted industry due to an historic amount of court fines – over $4 Billion USD for attempting to hide the harm and deaths from other products it lied about the safety of but still sold, including a charge of bribing a grand jury. —————— This government knew that, and it knew that it only received enough Pfizer Covid19 vaccine supply suddenly because India etc rejected it based on suspecting Pfizer lied about its trials and because it would not allow localised trials by governments to confirm its efficacy and safety claims. This government and PM also ignored MedSafe’s warnings that the Pfizer vaccine had 58 serious issues with it, but pushed it on NZers anyways and lied about its safety. MedSafe’s latest adverse reactions report and NZ doctors estimate over 160,000 NZers and increasing per day, have serious – life threatening and shortening adverse reactions to this vaccine. ACC is overwhelmed by increasing adverse reactions injury claims from this vaccine and has already approved 1,996 claims. The UK government ceased all mandates because its own data proved the vaccine had negative efficacy and a UK Police case regarding that had got to the international criminal court in The Hague. NZ’s government and agencies have breached the NZ Bill of Rights and gone against the medical science according to the recent court case that ruled mandates illegal for the Police and Army, and they have breached the Nuremberg Code. https://planetb-media.com/2022/03/25/nzs-government-lied-about-the-safety-of-the-covid19-vaccines/
    PLANETB-MEDIA.COM
    NZ’s Government Lied about the Safety of the Covid19 Vaccines
    A US regional clinical trial director has filed a $2 Billion USD lawsuit against Pfizer for faking its trial data and publishing fraudulent safety claims about its highly experimental Covid19 vacci…
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • 0 Comments 0 Shares
  • https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/02/24/new-zealand-4-in-5-covid-cases-hospitalisations-fully-vaccinated/
    DAILYEXPOSE.UK
    33% of New Zealand’s Covid-19 Hospitalisations in the last 6 months have occurred in the past 12 days; & the Fully Vaccinated account for 4 in every 5 of them
    According to official data published by New Zealand’s Ministry of Health, a total of 955 people have been admitted to hospital with Covid-19 between 16th Aug 21 and 22nd Feb 22. But analysis …
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • esterday morning I received an email from Keith Lynch, ‘Science Explainer’ at Stuff news. Apparently, Keith intends to write a ‘hit piece’ on me in Monday’s Stuff. Keith’s letter is below in italics. Based on Stuff’s continuing approach to attack unvaccinated people in the public eye or in elected positions without offering them any ‘right of reply’, I am publishing my answer to his questions in full, so that you can make up your own mind.

    Hello Guy

    My name is Keith Lynch and I’m a reporter at Stuff.

    I’m writing a piece about you and some of your writings on the Covid vaccine and I’ve some questions.

    Can you tell me more about your professional background? You say you worked for Global ID. Can you tell me more about the nature of your work there?
    I worked as a senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID). My official title was Director of Natural Products. The company developed statistical sampling and testing strategies based on PCR technology to ensure that both bulk and retail products were free of genetic modification. Genetic ID certification was used by its customers, including large primary product and retail suppliers, to ensure that they could gain access to international trade opportunities between countries and trading blocs including Japan, the EU, and many others. I was involved in all of these activities.

    What qualifications do you have that make you comment on the Covid vaccines? I note your PhD is in psychology (I also note that Maharishi University of Management is not accredited by the APA).
    Maharishi International University (MIU) is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission (HLC), the accrediting agency for universities and colleges in the North Central region of the US. The Higher Learning Commission is recognized by the US Department of Education and the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). MIU primary student intake is in programmes for Computer Professionals, Management, Integrative Health, and Sustainable and Regenerative Living. You can find out more for example at https://www.miu.edu/cba/accredited-by-iacbe.

    My BSc Hons undergraduate degree was in Logic and Theoretical Physics at the University of Sussex, UK. This included courses in foundations of mathematics and the scientific method. I have a Post Graduate Diploma in Teaching for Science, Physics, and English from Christchurch Teachers College (now part of Canterbury University).

    My MA thesis at MIU studied the use of Bloom’s mastery learning techniques in mathematics education to increase achievement in mathematics at the 2 sigma level. My PhD is nominally in the Psychology Department but focused on the use of time series analysis and panel regression analysis to investigate the effect of human factors including meditation on national competitive advantage as measured by social and economic indicators in 40 countries. For this, I analysed hundreds of data sets supplied by the Institute for Management Development in Lausanne, Switzerland.

    The conclusions of my thesis have been published in a peer-reviewed journal. In essence, meditation can enhance individual creativity and this can impact economic achievement positively and reduce social problems including crime.

    My work has been published in the journal Psychology, Crime, and Law. I was a keynote speaker at the annual conference of the British Psychological Society. I have written papers and lectured on QALYs, Quality Adjusted Life Years, a system of assessing the impact of health interventions on longevity and quality of life. I have written a book Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet which is available as a download from Amazon Kindle and Smashwords. It contains over 800 references to studies published in scholarly journals.

    You write on your site – He has lectured and advised governments in countries around the world on health and education initiatives.
    Can you expand on this?
    I have travelled extensively and lectured on the safety issues of genetic engineering and on the impact of over-regulation of the natural health products sector.

    I have met with State Prime Ministers and Ministers in Australia and Ministers in the UK and New Zealand.

    I have made presentations to MoH committees in New Zealand. I presented to the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification in New Zealand. There is a section in our Parliamentary Library of my writings.

    In 1990 I was invited to be a leader of a team working under the auspices of the Ministry of Health of Armenia to relieve PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) following an earthquake that killed over 25,000 people. Our team treated 35,000 people over the course of a year.

    For seven years I was director of a 60 million pound crime prevention community project in Merseyside, UK which received government funding and won a British Urban Renewal Award. This project also involved the founding of a new school which is now an award-winning free school fully funded by the UK Department of Education.

    Can you tell me more about how your adherence to the teachings of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi has shaped your beliefs on the Covid vaccine.
    I have never said that the teachings of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi shaped my ‘beliefs’ about Covid vaccination, which in any case are not beliefs and are actually based on published research.

    As Maharishi died in 2008, it is strange for you to suggest that he had opinions on mRNA Covid vaccines.

    I practice his technique of Transcendental Meditation and have done so since 1969. Extensive published research shows it aids mental clarity, health, and well being. The American Heart Association has endorsed it as a means of improving heart health and reducing blood pressure. I have greatly benefited from knowing the founder Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and I worked and communicated with him from time to time until his death in 2008, but I am not currently associated with any Transcendental Meditation organisation. I hold different views to Transcendental Meditation organisations.

    I realise that the understanding and development of consciousness is a legitimate aim of education. My current views largely rely on published research. In New Zealand, we live in a country where one is free to practice religion, take up yoga or meditation. What are you implying here?

    A number of people I’ve spoken to describe you as a leading voice in NZ’s anti vax movement. What do you make of that?
    In my book published in 2017, I cite no references opposing vaccination, nor do I discuss any anti-vax arguments.

    My wife’s sister died within 24 hours of receiving a polio vaccine, but my mother suffered disabilities as a result of contracting polio which affected her quality of life. My wife and I have both received vaccinations.

    There are very valid historical reasons why international human rights documents, to which New Zealand is a signatory, uphold personal medical choice. I, therefore, believe in general that medical procedures should always be a matter of informed choice.

    I am opposed to the mandating of mRNA vaccines. There are serious safety issues. Prima facie evidence exists corroborating this. The rate of adverse effect reporting for the Pfizer mRNA vaccine in New Zealand is running at 30x that of traditional flu vaccines.

    I have written extensively on this during the last six months. My views can be assessed from my website HatchardReport.com and have been reprinted widely by many media outlets.

    Your own university has published a thorough guide for students on the Covid vaccines that is broadly supportive. It specifically notes: “The Covid-19 vaccines are not ‘genetic engineering’ in that sense — they do not involve any modification or manipulation of our genes or DNA.”
    What do you make of it?
    https://www.miu.edu/admissions/coronavirus

    MIU is not ‘my own university’. I studied for a PhD there and was briefly on the faculty. The official views of MIU and myself are not identical. I note that MIU, like all accredited universities in the USA, is in receipt of very substantial federal educational grants; one recent condition of these grants is the formation of acceptable Covid vaccination policies.

    I note you’ve written that the vaccines are “gene manipulation”. Can you comment?
    I suggest you watch my video “The Pandemic of Biotechnology” which can be viewed at my website HatchardReport.com. It contains many scientific references. If you want to examine the history of the development of mRNA techniques from a pro-mRNA vaccine standpoint, I suggest you read an article from the journal Nature entitled “The tangled history of mRNA vaccines”.

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02483-w

    Even from this perspective, it is clear that mRNA vaccines emerged from work in gene therapy and gene manipulation. You are probably aware of recent work in Sweden confirming that mRNA vaccine sequences can integrate into human liver cells in vitro.

    In a recent Counterspin interview you cite a US study which found Omicron was much milder than Delta. The study also states: evidence for a reduction in severe outcomes among vaccinated cases with both Delta and Omicron variant infections in our study suggests substantial public health benefits from continued Covid-19 vaccination.” Do you reject this?
    https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.01.11.22269045v1.full-text

    You may not be aware, but I and many of my professional colleagues around the world are aware that it is a safe policy when submitting articles for publication in learned journals about Covid, to include some words encouraging Covid vaccination. It is a policy of many universities to expel researchers and professors who publicly express doubts about biotechnology and Covid vaccination. I also note, as a local example of this, that in a recent email exchange with a leading RNZ host he said it was unacceptable to air the views of anyone who opposed Covid vaccination.

    The study you refer to above was funded by the CDC. My comments reference a close look at the data the authors presented in the study. Because the unvaccinated data is not fully analysed in the paper, this is best explained in the following video by a professor who is actually known to be pro-vaccination, but nevertheless, he explains how the study data reveals little difference between Omicron outcomes for the vaccinated and unvaccinated. This is not data the CDC would be very happy about, its analysis was glossed over in the paper:


    In that interview you also state Omicron an “equal opportunity virus” that affects the vaccinated and unvaccinated equally. You make this claim despite a plethora of data showing unvaccinated people are much more likely to be hospitalised. Can you explain why you make this statement?
    I suggest you reference my analysis of NZ data published Saturday on my website and in the Daily Telegraph. In this, I fact check in great detail how the presentation by Stuff articles of relative risks as opposed absolute risks is designed to make Omicron seem frightening when in actuality Covid has evolved to become a relatively mild illness.

    Are Unvaccinated People at Serious Risk From Omicron in NZ?

    I also noted you continued to claim the vaccine was man-made. This is despite a range of studies emerging suggests it originated at the Wuhan Market – https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/02/26/science/covid-virus-wuhan-origins.html
    The article in the New York Times (a newspaper) has been widely lampooned; it reported a ‘study’ that has not been either published or peer-reviewed. I suggest you Google your question, the articles covering the issue will keep you busy until Christmas. My colleagues in the gene therapy field are of the opinion that there are a number of genetic sequences that are recognisably from gene therapy experiments.

    In your newsletter last week you wrote, “We woke up this morning to the news that Shane Warne aged 52 had died unexpectedly of a heart attack. Since he was travelling in Thailand at the time, no doubt he had had a Covid-19 vaccination. Was this causal? Possibly. At the very least you can forgive me for asking this question.”
    Can you explain why you made this claim when there was no evidence to suggest this was the case? Surely this is a very unscientific claim to make?
    It wasn’t a ‘claim’; it was a question. Why doesn’t Stuff ask more probing questions? MoH has warned heads of DHBs of the need to be very alert to spot cases of carditis following vaccination. Why haven’t MoH instituted a robust programme to collate data on the incidence of heart disease in NZ since vaccination?

    Astrid Koorneef has written to me on behalf of Ashley Bloomfield saying the MoH sees no need for mandatory reporting of adverse effects. Meanwhile many vaccine recipients presenting with tachycardia, chest pain, and shortness of breath are still being sent home by EDs and GPs without a CARM report or thorough investigation.

    Why do you think you know so many vaccine-injured people compared to the general public?
    This is a jolly question. You tell me. I am retired and living in a rural location. Why have so many of my friends and neighbours had adverse health incidents after Covid vaccination?

    Why did Jacinda Ardern delete the 33,000 comments from her FB page about vaccine adverse effects? Clearly, she has far more friends than me that have vaccine injuries.

    Why haven’t you been asking the Prime Minister? Why has the Health Forum NZ page been deleted by FB—the last refuge of vaccine-injured people in the absence of any coverage from Stuff?

    You mentioned in the Counterspin interview that your last chat with your friend involved him saying: ‘Thank God I’ve had the vaccine. Now I get on with my retirement and enjoy life.’
    Do you have any proof the vaccine was involved in this man’s death?
    He suffered known mRNA vaccine injuries – heart inflammation (carditis) and immune system suppression. Medsafe has a list of at least 150 deaths proximate to vaccination reported to CARM (many more have been reported to NZDSOS). For most of these, Medsafe maintains they cannot determine whether vaccination was the cause of death. ACC is denying many claims for compensation on this basis. Temporal association is the first criteria used to determine causality. I have suggested that there be a more determined approach to assessing cause of death proximate to vaccination. In some cases, this might involve an autopsy. As the numbers in New Zealand are small this should also involve international cooperation.

    I also note that last year you were supportive of Ardern and very supportive of Michael Baker’s elimination strategy in a number of Facebook posts. Can you explain what happened? Your opinion has changed dramatically?
    I was initially very supportive of Jacinda Ardern’s strategy of border closures. I believed and still believe that it should have bought New Zealand time to review an evolving research picture.

    In the event, the death rate in New Zealand from Covid infection is among the lowest in the world, if not the lowest. That is creditable.

    Early on there were scientific opinions that mRNA vaccination was safe and effective. It was believed that RNA genetic sequences would rapidly dissipate and the spike proteins generated by cells taking up the RNA sequences would stimulate an appropriate immune response and then also dissipate. This has not turned out to be the case.

    RNA sequences can continue to generate spike proteins over long periods. There is extensive lymph node hypermetabolism following vaccination. There is an unprecedented rate of adverse effects, some of which do not dissipate. We should have been more cautious about mRNA vaccines. The introduction of employment mandates was a big mistake from a safety perspective and an economic disaster.

    I see you referenced Michael Baker agreeing with your opinions re adverse effects in a piece
    https://www.thedailyexaminer.co.nz/the-long-read-jacinda-ardern-science-and-covid-mandates-events-facts-and-fallacies/

    I asked Michael about this this year and he said his comments were taken out of context. He was quite disappointed re this. Do you wish to reply?
    I have only quoted Michael Baker verbatim from emails between ourselves. I do not believe these are out of context. It is very important in all correspondence to own your opinions.

    Philip Hill has also told me you’re misrepresented his views.
    Philip Hill is a senior academic. I note that in the course of the correspondence between Michael, Philip, and myself and others, it was a cordial exchange of scientific views which I respect. Inexplicably, the correspondence came to an abrupt end when I expressed serious reservations about the safety of mRNA vaccination. There was one particular case of a young woman of 17 who died unexpectedly from a thrombotic event following vaccination. It has still not been admitted by Medsafe that this was caused by vaccination.

    I’d appreciate if you could come back to me by tomorrow morning.
    Keith


    The qualifications of Stuff’s Science Explainer. Image credit The BFD.
    I have questions for you Keith, I note that your qualifications are in marketing, commerce, and journalism, yet you are the chief covid science explainer editor for Stuff appointed at the start of the NZ vaccination rollout.

    You list three people on Linkedin who have influenced your thinking: Bill Gates, Helen Clark, and Simon Sinek. Was it a part of your job description on appointment at Stuff that your writing should support the government’s vaccination programme?

    How did you get such an appointment without a science background?

    Because I have been working for a long time off and on questioning the safety of genetic engineering and genetic medicine, I am aware that one’s views are not always well reported in mainstream media, so I am publishing my reply to you as a press release in the hope that other media outlets might pick it up and report it in full.

    Best wishes
    Guy Hatchard PhD
    HatchardReport.com

    https://thebfd.co.nz/2022/03/14/a-response-to-a-hit-piece/?fbclid=IwAR1aG37S-QQadgg5R8xozKKidOYFCcIC2K5K4zaOc4EgOIOF0VhVkZDnhaw
    esterday morning I received an email from Keith Lynch, ‘Science Explainer’ at Stuff news. Apparently, Keith intends to write a ‘hit piece’ on me in Monday’s Stuff. Keith’s letter is below in italics. Based on Stuff’s continuing approach to attack unvaccinated people in the public eye or in elected positions without offering them any ‘right of reply’, I am publishing my answer to his questions in full, so that you can make up your own mind. Hello Guy My name is Keith Lynch and I’m a reporter at Stuff. I’m writing a piece about you and some of your writings on the Covid vaccine and I’ve some questions. Can you tell me more about your professional background? You say you worked for Global ID. Can you tell me more about the nature of your work there? I worked as a senior manager at Genetic ID, a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID). My official title was Director of Natural Products. The company developed statistical sampling and testing strategies based on PCR technology to ensure that both bulk and retail products were free of genetic modification. Genetic ID certification was used by its customers, including large primary product and retail suppliers, to ensure that they could gain access to international trade opportunities between countries and trading blocs including Japan, the EU, and many others. I was involved in all of these activities. What qualifications do you have that make you comment on the Covid vaccines? I note your PhD is in psychology (I also note that Maharishi University of Management is not accredited by the APA). Maharishi International University (MIU) is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission (HLC), the accrediting agency for universities and colleges in the North Central region of the US. The Higher Learning Commission is recognized by the US Department of Education and the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). MIU primary student intake is in programmes for Computer Professionals, Management, Integrative Health, and Sustainable and Regenerative Living. You can find out more for example at https://www.miu.edu/cba/accredited-by-iacbe. My BSc Hons undergraduate degree was in Logic and Theoretical Physics at the University of Sussex, UK. This included courses in foundations of mathematics and the scientific method. I have a Post Graduate Diploma in Teaching for Science, Physics, and English from Christchurch Teachers College (now part of Canterbury University). My MA thesis at MIU studied the use of Bloom’s mastery learning techniques in mathematics education to increase achievement in mathematics at the 2 sigma level. My PhD is nominally in the Psychology Department but focused on the use of time series analysis and panel regression analysis to investigate the effect of human factors including meditation on national competitive advantage as measured by social and economic indicators in 40 countries. For this, I analysed hundreds of data sets supplied by the Institute for Management Development in Lausanne, Switzerland. The conclusions of my thesis have been published in a peer-reviewed journal. In essence, meditation can enhance individual creativity and this can impact economic achievement positively and reduce social problems including crime. My work has been published in the journal Psychology, Crime, and Law. I was a keynote speaker at the annual conference of the British Psychological Society. I have written papers and lectured on QALYs, Quality Adjusted Life Years, a system of assessing the impact of health interventions on longevity and quality of life. I have written a book Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet which is available as a download from Amazon Kindle and Smashwords. It contains over 800 references to studies published in scholarly journals. You write on your site – He has lectured and advised governments in countries around the world on health and education initiatives. Can you expand on this? I have travelled extensively and lectured on the safety issues of genetic engineering and on the impact of over-regulation of the natural health products sector. I have met with State Prime Ministers and Ministers in Australia and Ministers in the UK and New Zealand. I have made presentations to MoH committees in New Zealand. I presented to the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification in New Zealand. There is a section in our Parliamentary Library of my writings. In 1990 I was invited to be a leader of a team working under the auspices of the Ministry of Health of Armenia to relieve PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder) following an earthquake that killed over 25,000 people. Our team treated 35,000 people over the course of a year. For seven years I was director of a 60 million pound crime prevention community project in Merseyside, UK which received government funding and won a British Urban Renewal Award. This project also involved the founding of a new school which is now an award-winning free school fully funded by the UK Department of Education. Can you tell me more about how your adherence to the teachings of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi has shaped your beliefs on the Covid vaccine. I have never said that the teachings of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi shaped my ‘beliefs’ about Covid vaccination, which in any case are not beliefs and are actually based on published research. As Maharishi died in 2008, it is strange for you to suggest that he had opinions on mRNA Covid vaccines. I practice his technique of Transcendental Meditation and have done so since 1969. Extensive published research shows it aids mental clarity, health, and well being. The American Heart Association has endorsed it as a means of improving heart health and reducing blood pressure. I have greatly benefited from knowing the founder Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and I worked and communicated with him from time to time until his death in 2008, but I am not currently associated with any Transcendental Meditation organisation. I hold different views to Transcendental Meditation organisations. I realise that the understanding and development of consciousness is a legitimate aim of education. My current views largely rely on published research. In New Zealand, we live in a country where one is free to practice religion, take up yoga or meditation. What are you implying here? A number of people I’ve spoken to describe you as a leading voice in NZ’s anti vax movement. What do you make of that? In my book published in 2017, I cite no references opposing vaccination, nor do I discuss any anti-vax arguments. My wife’s sister died within 24 hours of receiving a polio vaccine, but my mother suffered disabilities as a result of contracting polio which affected her quality of life. My wife and I have both received vaccinations. There are very valid historical reasons why international human rights documents, to which New Zealand is a signatory, uphold personal medical choice. I, therefore, believe in general that medical procedures should always be a matter of informed choice. I am opposed to the mandating of mRNA vaccines. There are serious safety issues. Prima facie evidence exists corroborating this. The rate of adverse effect reporting for the Pfizer mRNA vaccine in New Zealand is running at 30x that of traditional flu vaccines. I have written extensively on this during the last six months. My views can be assessed from my website HatchardReport.com and have been reprinted widely by many media outlets. Your own university has published a thorough guide for students on the Covid vaccines that is broadly supportive. It specifically notes: “The Covid-19 vaccines are not ‘genetic engineering’ in that sense — they do not involve any modification or manipulation of our genes or DNA.” What do you make of it? https://www.miu.edu/admissions/coronavirus MIU is not ‘my own university’. I studied for a PhD there and was briefly on the faculty. The official views of MIU and myself are not identical. I note that MIU, like all accredited universities in the USA, is in receipt of very substantial federal educational grants; one recent condition of these grants is the formation of acceptable Covid vaccination policies. I note you’ve written that the vaccines are “gene manipulation”. Can you comment? I suggest you watch my video “The Pandemic of Biotechnology” which can be viewed at my website HatchardReport.com. It contains many scientific references. If you want to examine the history of the development of mRNA techniques from a pro-mRNA vaccine standpoint, I suggest you read an article from the journal Nature entitled “The tangled history of mRNA vaccines”. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02483-w Even from this perspective, it is clear that mRNA vaccines emerged from work in gene therapy and gene manipulation. You are probably aware of recent work in Sweden confirming that mRNA vaccine sequences can integrate into human liver cells in vitro. In a recent Counterspin interview you cite a US study which found Omicron was much milder than Delta. The study also states: evidence for a reduction in severe outcomes among vaccinated cases with both Delta and Omicron variant infections in our study suggests substantial public health benefits from continued Covid-19 vaccination.” Do you reject this? https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.01.11.22269045v1.full-text You may not be aware, but I and many of my professional colleagues around the world are aware that it is a safe policy when submitting articles for publication in learned journals about Covid, to include some words encouraging Covid vaccination. It is a policy of many universities to expel researchers and professors who publicly express doubts about biotechnology and Covid vaccination. I also note, as a local example of this, that in a recent email exchange with a leading RNZ host he said it was unacceptable to air the views of anyone who opposed Covid vaccination. The study you refer to above was funded by the CDC. My comments reference a close look at the data the authors presented in the study. Because the unvaccinated data is not fully analysed in the paper, this is best explained in the following video by a professor who is actually known to be pro-vaccination, but nevertheless, he explains how the study data reveals little difference between Omicron outcomes for the vaccinated and unvaccinated. This is not data the CDC would be very happy about, its analysis was glossed over in the paper: In that interview you also state Omicron an “equal opportunity virus” that affects the vaccinated and unvaccinated equally. You make this claim despite a plethora of data showing unvaccinated people are much more likely to be hospitalised. Can you explain why you make this statement? I suggest you reference my analysis of NZ data published Saturday on my website and in the Daily Telegraph. In this, I fact check in great detail how the presentation by Stuff articles of relative risks as opposed absolute risks is designed to make Omicron seem frightening when in actuality Covid has evolved to become a relatively mild illness. Are Unvaccinated People at Serious Risk From Omicron in NZ? I also noted you continued to claim the vaccine was man-made. This is despite a range of studies emerging suggests it originated at the Wuhan Market – https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/02/26/science/covid-virus-wuhan-origins.html The article in the New York Times (a newspaper) has been widely lampooned; it reported a ‘study’ that has not been either published or peer-reviewed. I suggest you Google your question, the articles covering the issue will keep you busy until Christmas. My colleagues in the gene therapy field are of the opinion that there are a number of genetic sequences that are recognisably from gene therapy experiments. In your newsletter last week you wrote, “We woke up this morning to the news that Shane Warne aged 52 had died unexpectedly of a heart attack. Since he was travelling in Thailand at the time, no doubt he had had a Covid-19 vaccination. Was this causal? Possibly. At the very least you can forgive me for asking this question.” Can you explain why you made this claim when there was no evidence to suggest this was the case? Surely this is a very unscientific claim to make? It wasn’t a ‘claim’; it was a question. Why doesn’t Stuff ask more probing questions? MoH has warned heads of DHBs of the need to be very alert to spot cases of carditis following vaccination. Why haven’t MoH instituted a robust programme to collate data on the incidence of heart disease in NZ since vaccination? Astrid Koorneef has written to me on behalf of Ashley Bloomfield saying the MoH sees no need for mandatory reporting of adverse effects. Meanwhile many vaccine recipients presenting with tachycardia, chest pain, and shortness of breath are still being sent home by EDs and GPs without a CARM report or thorough investigation. Why do you think you know so many vaccine-injured people compared to the general public? This is a jolly question. You tell me. I am retired and living in a rural location. Why have so many of my friends and neighbours had adverse health incidents after Covid vaccination? Why did Jacinda Ardern delete the 33,000 comments from her FB page about vaccine adverse effects? Clearly, she has far more friends than me that have vaccine injuries. Why haven’t you been asking the Prime Minister? Why has the Health Forum NZ page been deleted by FB—the last refuge of vaccine-injured people in the absence of any coverage from Stuff? You mentioned in the Counterspin interview that your last chat with your friend involved him saying: ‘Thank God I’ve had the vaccine. Now I get on with my retirement and enjoy life.’ Do you have any proof the vaccine was involved in this man’s death? He suffered known mRNA vaccine injuries – heart inflammation (carditis) and immune system suppression. Medsafe has a list of at least 150 deaths proximate to vaccination reported to CARM (many more have been reported to NZDSOS). For most of these, Medsafe maintains they cannot determine whether vaccination was the cause of death. ACC is denying many claims for compensation on this basis. Temporal association is the first criteria used to determine causality. I have suggested that there be a more determined approach to assessing cause of death proximate to vaccination. In some cases, this might involve an autopsy. As the numbers in New Zealand are small this should also involve international cooperation. I also note that last year you were supportive of Ardern and very supportive of Michael Baker’s elimination strategy in a number of Facebook posts. Can you explain what happened? Your opinion has changed dramatically? I was initially very supportive of Jacinda Ardern’s strategy of border closures. I believed and still believe that it should have bought New Zealand time to review an evolving research picture. In the event, the death rate in New Zealand from Covid infection is among the lowest in the world, if not the lowest. That is creditable. Early on there were scientific opinions that mRNA vaccination was safe and effective. It was believed that RNA genetic sequences would rapidly dissipate and the spike proteins generated by cells taking up the RNA sequences would stimulate an appropriate immune response and then also dissipate. This has not turned out to be the case. RNA sequences can continue to generate spike proteins over long periods. There is extensive lymph node hypermetabolism following vaccination. There is an unprecedented rate of adverse effects, some of which do not dissipate. We should have been more cautious about mRNA vaccines. The introduction of employment mandates was a big mistake from a safety perspective and an economic disaster. I see you referenced Michael Baker agreeing with your opinions re adverse effects in a piece https://www.thedailyexaminer.co.nz/the-long-read-jacinda-ardern-science-and-covid-mandates-events-facts-and-fallacies/ I asked Michael about this this year and he said his comments were taken out of context. He was quite disappointed re this. Do you wish to reply? I have only quoted Michael Baker verbatim from emails between ourselves. I do not believe these are out of context. It is very important in all correspondence to own your opinions. Philip Hill has also told me you’re misrepresented his views. Philip Hill is a senior academic. I note that in the course of the correspondence between Michael, Philip, and myself and others, it was a cordial exchange of scientific views which I respect. Inexplicably, the correspondence came to an abrupt end when I expressed serious reservations about the safety of mRNA vaccination. There was one particular case of a young woman of 17 who died unexpectedly from a thrombotic event following vaccination. It has still not been admitted by Medsafe that this was caused by vaccination. I’d appreciate if you could come back to me by tomorrow morning. Keith The qualifications of Stuff’s Science Explainer. Image credit The BFD. I have questions for you Keith, I note that your qualifications are in marketing, commerce, and journalism, yet you are the chief covid science explainer editor for Stuff appointed at the start of the NZ vaccination rollout. You list three people on Linkedin who have influenced your thinking: Bill Gates, Helen Clark, and Simon Sinek. Was it a part of your job description on appointment at Stuff that your writing should support the government’s vaccination programme? How did you get such an appointment without a science background? Because I have been working for a long time off and on questioning the safety of genetic engineering and genetic medicine, I am aware that one’s views are not always well reported in mainstream media, so I am publishing my reply to you as a press release in the hope that other media outlets might pick it up and report it in full. Best wishes Guy Hatchard PhD HatchardReport.com https://thebfd.co.nz/2022/03/14/a-response-to-a-hit-piece/?fbclid=IwAR1aG37S-QQadgg5R8xozKKidOYFCcIC2K5K4zaOc4EgOIOF0VhVkZDnhaw
    WWW.MIU.EDU
    Accredited by IACBE
    MIU has received specialized accreditation for its business programs through the International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education (IACBE).
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • WWW.TINYHOUSEEXPO.CO.NZ
    Tiny House Expo
    Dreaming of your own tiny house? It's time to pause youtube, get off insta and come along to The Tiny House Expo. A unique two-day event that helps you to connect you with your tribe, expand your knowledge, discover, learn, celebrate and shape the growing tiny house and alternative living movement in New Zealand.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • A new documentary is out - Planet Lockdown: The film Planet Lockdown explores this unprecedented time in history, speaking with epidemiologists, scientists, doctors and other experts to uncover the real motives behind the increasing totalitarian control taking over the globe
    Dr. Scott Jensen, a family doctor and former member of the Minnesota Senate, received an email from the Department of Health that coached him to use COVID-19 as a diagnosis incorrectly
    The notion of asymptomatic spread turns virtually anyone you meet or encounter on the street into the enemy or a threat, furthering fear and control
    The artificially imposed state of incoherence that’s been enacted during the pandemic is described as a torture tactic, designed to get people to submit to vaccine passports and COVID-19 shots
    Many of the experts in the film bring up the Nuremberg Code, which is being violated as people are forced to get experimental shots
    Civil disobedience, boycotting businesses that are requiring vaccine passports, participating in rallies and fighting illegal mandates in court are ways that everyone can get involved in protecting freedom
    Prior to 2020, if you heard the term "lockdown" you might think of something that happens in a prison — not in a free society. This mechanism of control has since become commonplace — not among prisoners but among the free — with repercussions that are only beginning to be understood.

    The film Planet Lockdown explores this unprecedented time in history, speaking with epidemiologists, scientists, doctors and other experts to uncover the real motives behind the increasing totalitarian control taking over the globe. Already banned by Facebook and YouTube,1 the film starts at the beginning of the pandemic, when we were told lockdowns were necessary to "flatten the curve."

    This was supposed to be a short-term, 15-day event in the U.S., but the narrative soon changed to ongoing restrictions. As Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco, now owned by Novartis, explained, people have historically quarantined the sick, but quarantining healthy people, as has occurred for the past two years, has no scientific backing or historic precedence.2

    "Given this virus represents, at most, a slightly bigger risk to the old and ill than seasonal influenza, and a less risk, a smaller risk, to almost everyone else who's younger and fit," Yeadon says, "it was never necessary for us to have done anything. We didn't need to do anything — lockdowns, masks, testing, vaccines even."3

    Questionable Practices Urged for COVID-19 Diagnosis
    Dr. Scott Jensen, a family doctor and former member of the Minnesota Senate, received an email from the Department of Health that seemed to be coaching him to use COVID-19 as a diagnosis in situations where he wouldn't have previously used influenza or any other specific viral diagnosis without first testing for it. He said:4

    "What struck me right away was I felt like I was being coached to go ahead and use COVID-19 without using the same standards of precision that I would for other things. If I'm going to make a diagnosis, I believe as a physician I have an obligation to use the tools available to me to nail it down with as much certainty as possible.

    And it seemed to me that the Department of Health, and the link to this CDC document that said you could diagnose COVID-19 as a cause of death on a death certificate … those two documents, in tandem, went against everything that I had been taught or doing for the last 35 years."

    Even Dr. Ngozi Ezike, director of the Illinois Department of Health, is featured in the film stating that even if you died of a clear alternate cause, if you had COVID-19 at the same time, it would still be listed as a COVID death. "Everyone who is listed as a COVID death, doesn't mean that was the cause of the death," she says.5

    In January 2020, the PCR test for COVID-19 came out, which allowed health officials to define COVID-19 "cases." If the test was positive, it counted as a case — it didn't matter if you have symptoms or not. Reiner Fuellmich, global fraud attorney, founder of the Corona Investigative Committee, pointed out, "It's never, in the history of mankind, in the history of medicine, there's never been testing of healthy people."6

    Yeadon agrees that mass testing of people with no symptoms has no scientific basis. Rather, he says, "It's just a way to frighten people."7 The rising "cases," based on PCR testing, is what built the crisis. But counting cases was only measuring the activity of testing; the more that testing occurred, the more cases that were found.

    'Fear Everyone' Became the Message
    June 8, 2020, WHO director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus announced that asymptomatic people could transmit COVID-19. That same day, Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that people who have COVID-19 without any symptoms "rarely" transmit the disease to others. In a dramatic about-face, WHO then backtracked on the statement just one day later.8

    In the days that followed, media and health officials ramped up fear by claiming that you could be sickened by virtually anyone, even when they appeared to be healthy. "This idea that … you can be ill even though you have no symptoms and you can be a … virus threat to someone else even though you have no symptoms, that's also invented in 2020," Yeadon says.9

    Alexandra Henrion-Caude, geneticist, former director of research with the French National Institute of Health, is among those who have noticed something off from the start. "I was very puzzled since the very beginning … I was alert to the fact that what we were living was not quite right."10

    She notes that the notion of asymptomatic spread is terrifying because it turns virtually anyone you meet or encounter on the street into the enemy, because they could be exposing you to SARS-CoV-2. "This is actually terrible because it denies the capacity of a person to be a healthy person. Because if asymptomatic [spread] exists, then who is healthy? No one."

    What's more, the "proof" of asymptomatic spread is flawed and fraudulent. The New England Journal of Medicine published an article suggesting the transmission of COVID-19 is possible from an asymptomatic carrier in January 2020.11

    It was based on a 33-year-old businessman who had met with his business partner from Shanghai, then developed a fever and productive cough. The next evening, he felt better and went back to work January 27.

    The writers reported the partner had been "well with no signs or symptoms of infection, but had become ill on her flight back to China, where she tested positive for 2019-nCoV on January 26." From this case study, they theorized the virus could be transmitted from asymptomatic carriers. An important point was left out, which is that the researchers did not speak with the partner from Shanghai before publication.

    However, Germany's public health agency, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), did speak with the woman on the phone, and she reported she did have symptoms while in Germany.12 So she was not asymptomatic after all.

    In a State of Incoherence, People Crave Normalcy
    The pandemic has twisted reality, leaving the public in a mental fog. "You're regularly pledging obedience to things which are not logical," Catherine Austin-Fitts, assistant secretary, Bush Sr. administration and investment adviser with Solari, Inc., says.13 WHO has changed definitions of herd immunity and pandemic, literally altering reality, and this is just one example.

    Censorship and campaigns to discredit those who speak out against the narrative are additional control mechanisms that distort the truth. Bishop Schneider of Kazakhstan says the pandemic measures are very similar to Soviet times where he lived, in that there was only one narrative, and if you said there was another meaning, you were declared an enemy.

    "When you had another opinion, they said, 'You are a conspiracy group. You have a conspiracy theory. You have hate speech. This expression, hate speech, came from the communists."14 It's psychological manipulation, based on fear, which makes people act totally irrational. The artificially imposed state of incoherence was even described by Austin-Fitts as a torture tactic, designed to get people to submit to vaccine passports and COVID-19 shots:15

    "Human beings crave coherence. And so if you can put them in a state of incoherence they will literally do anything they can to get back to coherence. It's a typical torture tactic. 'If you just do what I want, I will allow you to go back to a state of coherence.' So, if you just accept the [vaccine] passports, you'll be free. Or if you get the vaccination, you'll just be free."

    Further, by declaring small businesses as "nonessential" during lockdowns, they get shut down, while Amazon, Walmart and other big box stores can take over their market share. A major transfer of wealth occurred away from small family-owned businesses to very large, publicly owned businesses that benefited from the digital economy. In the meantime, Austin-Fitts explains:16

    "The people on Main St. have to keep paying off their credit cards or their mortgage, so they're in a debt trap and they're desperate to get cashflow to cover their debts and expenses.

    In the meantime, you have the Federal Reserve institute a form of quantitative easing where they're buying corporate bonds, and the guys who are taking up the market share can basically finance — or their banks can — at 0% to 1%, when everyone on Main St. is paying 16% to 17% to their credit cards, without income.

    So basically now you've got them over a barrel and you can take away their market share, and generally they can't afford to do what they say because they're too busy trying to find money to feed their kids."

    New Control Systems Are Being Engineered
    If a few people want to control many, how can you get the sheep into the slaughterhouse without them realizing and resisting? "The perfect thing," Austin-Fitts says, is invisible enemies, like viruses.17 This ramps up fear so the public believes they need the government to protect them. Another effective tactic is "divide and conquer," and the media plays an important role in this, dividing people over shots and masks, for instance.

    "What COVID-19 is," Austin-Fitts explains, "is the institution of controls necessary to convert the planet from the democratic process to technocracy. So what we're watching is a change in control and an engineering of new control systems. So think of this as a coup d'état. It's much more like a coup d'état than a virus."18

    Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former public health official and member of German parliament, agrees, stating that pandemic responses have "nothing to do with hygiene. It has to do with criminology."19 The global injection campaign is another form of control, one that's forcing the public to receive experimental shots.

    Many of the experts in the film bring up the Nuremberg Code, which spells out a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation. This set of principles was developed to ensure the medical horrors discovered during the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II would never take place again.

    But in the current climate of extreme censorship, people are not being informed about the full risks of the shots — which are only beginning to be uncovered. People are being forced into the shots due to mandates and loss of jobs and personal freedoms, like the ability to travel freely and attend business and social events.

    In the End, Truth Will Win
    A revolution is occurring, and the experts are hopeful that people will awaken to common sense and resist the totalitarian control that is threatening to take over the globe. Instead, society can be regenerated if people come together and fight back against the encroachment on our liberties.

    Civil disobedience, boycotting businesses that are requiring vaccine passports, participating in rallies and fighting illegal mandates in court are ways that everyone can get involved in protecting freedom. "If they want to make us a machine, if they want to make us slaves, we say no," Wodarg says. "… We don't need you anymore, we are many … we don't have to be afraid of any pandemic."20

    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/03/12/planet-lockdown-documentary.aspx?ui=31840cef1f68f373e2e8e6118db45971ac48ecef546cc9135a6519dea84c6c6d&sd=20140526&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20220312&mid=DM1132090&rid=1431506995
    A new documentary is out - Planet Lockdown: The film Planet Lockdown explores this unprecedented time in history, speaking with epidemiologists, scientists, doctors and other experts to uncover the real motives behind the increasing totalitarian control taking over the globe Dr. Scott Jensen, a family doctor and former member of the Minnesota Senate, received an email from the Department of Health that coached him to use COVID-19 as a diagnosis incorrectly The notion of asymptomatic spread turns virtually anyone you meet or encounter on the street into the enemy or a threat, furthering fear and control The artificially imposed state of incoherence that’s been enacted during the pandemic is described as a torture tactic, designed to get people to submit to vaccine passports and COVID-19 shots Many of the experts in the film bring up the Nuremberg Code, which is being violated as people are forced to get experimental shots Civil disobedience, boycotting businesses that are requiring vaccine passports, participating in rallies and fighting illegal mandates in court are ways that everyone can get involved in protecting freedom Prior to 2020, if you heard the term "lockdown" you might think of something that happens in a prison — not in a free society. This mechanism of control has since become commonplace — not among prisoners but among the free — with repercussions that are only beginning to be understood. The film Planet Lockdown explores this unprecedented time in history, speaking with epidemiologists, scientists, doctors and other experts to uncover the real motives behind the increasing totalitarian control taking over the globe. Already banned by Facebook and YouTube,1 the film starts at the beginning of the pandemic, when we were told lockdowns were necessary to "flatten the curve." This was supposed to be a short-term, 15-day event in the U.S., but the narrative soon changed to ongoing restrictions. As Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco, now owned by Novartis, explained, people have historically quarantined the sick, but quarantining healthy people, as has occurred for the past two years, has no scientific backing or historic precedence.2 "Given this virus represents, at most, a slightly bigger risk to the old and ill than seasonal influenza, and a less risk, a smaller risk, to almost everyone else who's younger and fit," Yeadon says, "it was never necessary for us to have done anything. We didn't need to do anything — lockdowns, masks, testing, vaccines even."3 Questionable Practices Urged for COVID-19 Diagnosis Dr. Scott Jensen, a family doctor and former member of the Minnesota Senate, received an email from the Department of Health that seemed to be coaching him to use COVID-19 as a diagnosis in situations where he wouldn't have previously used influenza or any other specific viral diagnosis without first testing for it. He said:4 "What struck me right away was I felt like I was being coached to go ahead and use COVID-19 without using the same standards of precision that I would for other things. If I'm going to make a diagnosis, I believe as a physician I have an obligation to use the tools available to me to nail it down with as much certainty as possible. And it seemed to me that the Department of Health, and the link to this CDC document that said you could diagnose COVID-19 as a cause of death on a death certificate … those two documents, in tandem, went against everything that I had been taught or doing for the last 35 years." Even Dr. Ngozi Ezike, director of the Illinois Department of Health, is featured in the film stating that even if you died of a clear alternate cause, if you had COVID-19 at the same time, it would still be listed as a COVID death. "Everyone who is listed as a COVID death, doesn't mean that was the cause of the death," she says.5 In January 2020, the PCR test for COVID-19 came out, which allowed health officials to define COVID-19 "cases." If the test was positive, it counted as a case — it didn't matter if you have symptoms or not. Reiner Fuellmich, global fraud attorney, founder of the Corona Investigative Committee, pointed out, "It's never, in the history of mankind, in the history of medicine, there's never been testing of healthy people."6 Yeadon agrees that mass testing of people with no symptoms has no scientific basis. Rather, he says, "It's just a way to frighten people."7 The rising "cases," based on PCR testing, is what built the crisis. But counting cases was only measuring the activity of testing; the more that testing occurred, the more cases that were found. 'Fear Everyone' Became the Message June 8, 2020, WHO director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus announced that asymptomatic people could transmit COVID-19. That same day, Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that people who have COVID-19 without any symptoms "rarely" transmit the disease to others. In a dramatic about-face, WHO then backtracked on the statement just one day later.8 In the days that followed, media and health officials ramped up fear by claiming that you could be sickened by virtually anyone, even when they appeared to be healthy. "This idea that … you can be ill even though you have no symptoms and you can be a … virus threat to someone else even though you have no symptoms, that's also invented in 2020," Yeadon says.9 Alexandra Henrion-Caude, geneticist, former director of research with the French National Institute of Health, is among those who have noticed something off from the start. "I was very puzzled since the very beginning … I was alert to the fact that what we were living was not quite right."10 She notes that the notion of asymptomatic spread is terrifying because it turns virtually anyone you meet or encounter on the street into the enemy, because they could be exposing you to SARS-CoV-2. "This is actually terrible because it denies the capacity of a person to be a healthy person. Because if asymptomatic [spread] exists, then who is healthy? No one." What's more, the "proof" of asymptomatic spread is flawed and fraudulent. The New England Journal of Medicine published an article suggesting the transmission of COVID-19 is possible from an asymptomatic carrier in January 2020.11 It was based on a 33-year-old businessman who had met with his business partner from Shanghai, then developed a fever and productive cough. The next evening, he felt better and went back to work January 27. The writers reported the partner had been "well with no signs or symptoms of infection, but had become ill on her flight back to China, where she tested positive for 2019-nCoV on January 26." From this case study, they theorized the virus could be transmitted from asymptomatic carriers. An important point was left out, which is that the researchers did not speak with the partner from Shanghai before publication. However, Germany's public health agency, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), did speak with the woman on the phone, and she reported she did have symptoms while in Germany.12 So she was not asymptomatic after all. In a State of Incoherence, People Crave Normalcy The pandemic has twisted reality, leaving the public in a mental fog. "You're regularly pledging obedience to things which are not logical," Catherine Austin-Fitts, assistant secretary, Bush Sr. administration and investment adviser with Solari, Inc., says.13 WHO has changed definitions of herd immunity and pandemic, literally altering reality, and this is just one example. Censorship and campaigns to discredit those who speak out against the narrative are additional control mechanisms that distort the truth. Bishop Schneider of Kazakhstan says the pandemic measures are very similar to Soviet times where he lived, in that there was only one narrative, and if you said there was another meaning, you were declared an enemy. "When you had another opinion, they said, 'You are a conspiracy group. You have a conspiracy theory. You have hate speech. This expression, hate speech, came from the communists."14 It's psychological manipulation, based on fear, which makes people act totally irrational. The artificially imposed state of incoherence was even described by Austin-Fitts as a torture tactic, designed to get people to submit to vaccine passports and COVID-19 shots:15 "Human beings crave coherence. And so if you can put them in a state of incoherence they will literally do anything they can to get back to coherence. It's a typical torture tactic. 'If you just do what I want, I will allow you to go back to a state of coherence.' So, if you just accept the [vaccine] passports, you'll be free. Or if you get the vaccination, you'll just be free." Further, by declaring small businesses as "nonessential" during lockdowns, they get shut down, while Amazon, Walmart and other big box stores can take over their market share. A major transfer of wealth occurred away from small family-owned businesses to very large, publicly owned businesses that benefited from the digital economy. In the meantime, Austin-Fitts explains:16 "The people on Main St. have to keep paying off their credit cards or their mortgage, so they're in a debt trap and they're desperate to get cashflow to cover their debts and expenses. In the meantime, you have the Federal Reserve institute a form of quantitative easing where they're buying corporate bonds, and the guys who are taking up the market share can basically finance — or their banks can — at 0% to 1%, when everyone on Main St. is paying 16% to 17% to their credit cards, without income. So basically now you've got them over a barrel and you can take away their market share, and generally they can't afford to do what they say because they're too busy trying to find money to feed their kids." New Control Systems Are Being Engineered If a few people want to control many, how can you get the sheep into the slaughterhouse without them realizing and resisting? "The perfect thing," Austin-Fitts says, is invisible enemies, like viruses.17 This ramps up fear so the public believes they need the government to protect them. Another effective tactic is "divide and conquer," and the media plays an important role in this, dividing people over shots and masks, for instance. "What COVID-19 is," Austin-Fitts explains, "is the institution of controls necessary to convert the planet from the democratic process to technocracy. So what we're watching is a change in control and an engineering of new control systems. So think of this as a coup d'état. It's much more like a coup d'état than a virus."18 Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former public health official and member of German parliament, agrees, stating that pandemic responses have "nothing to do with hygiene. It has to do with criminology."19 The global injection campaign is another form of control, one that's forcing the public to receive experimental shots. Many of the experts in the film bring up the Nuremberg Code, which spells out a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation. This set of principles was developed to ensure the medical horrors discovered during the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II would never take place again. But in the current climate of extreme censorship, people are not being informed about the full risks of the shots — which are only beginning to be uncovered. People are being forced into the shots due to mandates and loss of jobs and personal freedoms, like the ability to travel freely and attend business and social events. In the End, Truth Will Win A revolution is occurring, and the experts are hopeful that people will awaken to common sense and resist the totalitarian control that is threatening to take over the globe. Instead, society can be regenerated if people come together and fight back against the encroachment on our liberties. Civil disobedience, boycotting businesses that are requiring vaccine passports, participating in rallies and fighting illegal mandates in court are ways that everyone can get involved in protecting freedom. "If they want to make us a machine, if they want to make us slaves, we say no," Wodarg says. "… We don't need you anymore, we are many … we don't have to be afraid of any pandemic."20 https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/03/12/planet-lockdown-documentary.aspx?ui=31840cef1f68f373e2e8e6118db45971ac48ecef546cc9135a6519dea84c6c6d&sd=20140526&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20220312&mid=DM1132090&rid=1431506995
    Planet Lockdown: Exposing the Truth
    'Planet Lockdown' explores the real motives behind the increasing control of totalitarian regimes globally. Watch this documentary for free here.
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • Revisiting Dr David Martin - on the subject of patents for the covid viruses - "If you own the patent on the gene itself and you own the patent on its detection, you have a cunning advantage of being able to control 100 of the providence of ot only the virus itself but also its detection." The patent was rejected twice as it was already existing Coronavirus recorded in the domain" The CDC overrode the patent office with a bribe and they paid an additional fee to keep their application private .....https://fb.watch/btK_yb9KWh/
    Revisiting Dr David Martin - on the subject of patents for the covid viruses - "If you own the patent on the gene itself and you own the patent on its detection, you have a cunning advantage of being able to control 100 of the providence of ot only the virus itself but also its detection." The patent was rejected twice as it was already existing Coronavirus recorded in the domain" The CDC overrode the patent office with a bribe and they paid an additional fee to keep their application private .....https://fb.watch/btK_yb9KWh/
    0 Comments 0 Shares
  • VOCES8: 'Vincent' by Don McLean (arr. Jim Clements)
    Here's one of our favourite moments from our Live From London Summer 2021 concert last Sunday. Blake delivered a beautiful rendition of the song 'Vincent' - Don McLean's tribute to Van Gogh.

    "This world was never meant for one as beautiful as you".
    VOCES8: 'Vincent' by Don McLean (arr. Jim Clements) Here's one of our favourite moments from our Live From London Summer 2021 concert last Sunday. Blake delivered a beautiful rendition of the song 'Vincent' - Don McLean's tribute to Van Gogh. "This world was never meant for one as beautiful as you".
    0 Comments 0 Shares
More Stories